Very good hope he can win it.

It did say it was only in by millimetres, if so you're not going to be able to detect that with the human eye. Hence the reason it's there.

I doubt it...Nadal has never lost at Roland Garros and has beaten Federer for the past 3 seasons...one semi-final and 2 finals...he's almost unbeatable on clay and i think he's proved these past couple of seasons he's far far from being just a clay-court player

It's only 99% accurate though. I know I'm fussy but it can still change outomes of matches.

Greg Rusedski, quite like his commentary. No idea why

That's more accurate than the line judges themselves, though.

Seems to know what he is talking about. Pitty he didn't perform like it in his playing days.

I don't know, a grand slam runner up is a pretty good effort, plus got to number 4 in the world.

It grinds on me!

It sounds like he is patronising his co commentator and audience with everything he says, obviously he isn't but it must just be his accent.


And he over exaggerates everything too! eg. That was a [ifabulous[/i shot!

so we have a British winner then. Well done to Murry and his partner whose name escapes me.

Jelena Jankovic is her name Onewild.

Good stuff from the elder Murray, find the best partner you can and hope it works

well done federer a true champion.