Quote: "First off, I don't know jack about F1 ("Same as football then", someone will say).
This Vettel-Webber thing. Is it a genuine scandal around the rest of the world, or is it the English media bias that is favouring the convict over the German?
During the race was Vettel behind Webber and overtook him to win the race? If that's the case couldn't Webber have just raced him as a competitor?
When Schumacher was F1 King at Ferrari, would Ferrari have ever ordered him to let his team mate take the first place? If they didn't, wouldn't Schumacher have done the same as Vettel if he was getting those orders?
From an non-F1 fan it all seems like a fuss over nothing to me. Vettel is the World Champion Driver. I'd kind of expect him to fight an order to let his team mate win if it meant it could cost him the title.
Vettel's said that Webber has never backed him that much anyway. Is there any truth in that or is he just re-writing history?'"
When your team tell you to do something you should do it.
Webber was doing exactly as he was told but Vettel attacked and passed him after they were told in code not to.
It is poop housing no doubt about it.
Vettel is a lose cannon Webber isn't so Webber was never going to act in the same way as the spoilt little German shoite head.
Another German in Rosberg was told to hold station and unlike his fellow countryman did as he was told even though it seriously annoyed him.
Team fighting happens you only have to look at yesterday to see that 'Tell him to calm down' from JB was funny to hear but the team let them get on with it generally.
But when they are told to stop it then they should Vettel thinks he can do whatever he want's however.