Such a shame that despite all reiterations, there will always be questions surrounding any dominant indivual performance.

FWIW I am utterly convinced that Froome and the overwhelming majority of the peloton are riding clean. Any more high profile cyclists caught doping then any integretity the sport has built up over the past couple of years is gone and major sponsors would withdraw from the sport.

I have to say that I really empathised with Contador's indignation at Quintana pushing on at the front when the Spaniard had hit the deck.

Bertie has always been the epitome of a good sportsman who would never take advantage if a rival of his had some misfortune befall him. I mean imagine if in 2010 when he was battling with Frank Schleck for the Tour & Schleck had lost his chain on the final climb of a stage, can anyone seriously imagine that Contador would take advantage? Such a scenario is as unlikely as being able to buy a Spanish steak that isn't laced with Clenbuterol.

I'm not convinced at all. On the one hand I'm heartened that there were two riders caught earlier this year thanks to rumours in the peloton. That's a really positive step.

Prior to oxygen vector doping taking off though riders showed their Grand Tour talent early. Lemond was third in his first tour. In the 2010 Giro Froome was disqualified for hanging on to cars. In the 2011 Vuelta he was blowing Cobo away on the steepest climbs of the year and could have been the first British GT winner if Sky had switched leaders earlier.

So much else has changed since the pre EPO days that it would be daft to put all the changed effects down to doping. But [url=http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/11385/Anti-doping-scientist-warns-of-undetectable-EPO-variants.aspxthese aren't post EPO days[/url, and there's AICAR, Telmisartan and a host of other untestables out there too. Those latter two would perfectly suit the physical transformations of Wiggins, Porte and Froome.

Sky didn't exactly help themselves with who they've employed over the years.

I want to believe, and I'm very far from at the point of making accusations. I just think there's enough out there to support those who are suspicious. The best all of us can hope for is to find out ten years from now if and when retrospective testing is done on today's samples.

Oh and fsck Bertie. Fsck him with his ty pistol celebration.

Two rants

1. Feck off Contador (what Yorkshire-Red said below)

2. Feck off Froome - for complaining about Contador being reckless on the descent for two reasons. First of all - you don't have to follow him if you think he is being reckless and secondly - why when it is perfectly acceptable to attack on a climb/TT/windy day do certain pro cyclists think that attacking on a descent is wrong?

Has anyone else noticed how Froome looks like a praying mantis that has been sellotaped onto a road bike?

Agree with Haggis Fax about Froome too. Contador is generally a much better descender than Froome & given his inability to take time out of him in the climbs it makes perfect sense to have a go & take a bit of time back on a tricky descent.

Interesting course today. Apparently Froome is going to switch bikes at the top of the second climb from road to TT.

He pedals with his elbows and never takes his eyes off his power meter.

Quote John_D="John_D"Interesting course today. Apparently Froome is going to switch bikes at the top of the second climb from road to TT.'" https://twitter.com/mrconde/status/357429736844165121 Presumably road bike for the climbs and TT for the descents.

Quote John_D="John_D"Interesting course today. Apparently Froome is going to switch bikes at the top of the second climb from road to TT.'" https://twitter.com/mrconde/status/357429736844165121 Presumably road bike for the climbs and TT for the descents.

Indeed so. Jon Izaguirre and Lieuwe Westra did and sit first and second at the moment.

Storms expected in about an hour, just as the GC contenders are getting going...

Real shame for Mollema.