Quote John_D="John_D"No further action because a free-kick was awarded which means it's thought to have been dealt with at the time.
I'd have less of an issue with that - only slightly less as it's still absurd - if it was applied consistently.'"
He barged him over. Then when Luiz was on the ground he decided to jump on him with both feet. The free kick was for knocking him over.
It's BS. It's a stupid law and their implementation of it is a joke.
If they don't want to "re-referee" games then WTF is the dubious goals panel all about? They let people rule on nothing decisions about who gets credit for goals but won't allow two footed lunges and career threatening challenges to be ruled on.
Hopefully the stupid Chelsea board will take a look at the utter shafting we've been getting for years and realise if you don't stand up for yourself this is how you get treated. Foy's refereeing of Chelsea has been an utter joke. Jose wouldn't have stood for the **** we've put up with for years. The stupid Chelsea board thought that it was Jose that was at fault, but they've screwed us over for years even after Jose's been gone.
Not banning Aguero actually helps us, because it means he'll play Tottenham and hopefully play a part in Spurs losing. But this nonsense over their selectively charging people is a pathetic joke. It's an abdication of their responsibilities. If ref's don't like their decisions being questioned then they need to simply make better decisions.