Quote Dunbar="Dunbar"
What strikes me most about Union is how the rules stifle the best teams and bring the teams much closer
'"
How would that be ?
Quote Dunbar
the All Blacks were so superior to the English team it was untrue
'"
Not sure which game you were watching, NZ started the game far better and were the more prescise team thoughout. They profited by poor England defence in the first half.
Quote Dunbar
and yet the score line ended up pretty close. As far as I can see that is because the rules at the breakdown make it very difficult to develop structured attacking plays'"
The first 30 minutes England had trouble getting their hands on the ball and NZ were successful at generating quick ball. This contradicts what you stated above. The current law interpretations actually favour the attacking team.
Quote Dunbar
What I would say is that if those two teams were playing League, the All Blacks would have won by 50+... Union must be such a frustrating game to play if you are a talented rugby player'"
Now I am pretty sure you did not watch the game. England one more ball in the opposition 22 than NZ did, the last 20 minutes England were in the ascendancy. Having said that NZ were the better team and deserved to in what ended up being a very close game. As for the comment about talented players being frustrated, Jason Robinson stated on more than one occasion RU gave him more opportunity to expression than he found in RL, arguably he was the most exciting back to emerge outside the NRL.