I'm finding it quite hilarious watching the Hudds fans flounder on this topic, especially durham giant, its not the same when youre on somebody elses board is it?? I made all these points on the hudds board and was called every name under the sun but as soon as I gave some back I got banned!


Regarding the whole situation, You are wasting your breath trying to even explain it to the Hudds fans as they will simply not see sense. you cannot defend Nathan Browns actions in the last few days and he is far luckier escaping punishment than O'loughlin was.


The tackle was deemed by the referee and TJ to be a little late, I thought he was commited, the judiciary said it was commited but slightly high, either way a caution should end the situation, but not in Browns eyes he said it warranted a ban of up to 2 months, this is a laughable statement and he can gloss it over as much as he wants, he is bitter and angry about the tackle and is doing his best to create a bigger picture to detract from the fact that he spat the dummy out about 1 tackle.


How anybody can compare a late, high tackle to condoning violence from your enforcers is beyond me!!

Our friend from overt' Pennines looks like he needs some help with definitions so......

reckless

• adjective =#BF0040without thought or care for the consequences of an action.



careless

• adjective 1 =#BF0040not giving sufficient attention or thought to avoiding harm or mistakes


Keywords are "WITHOUT" and "NOT GIVING SUFFICIENT" - to make things very simple for our friend smokey without means none, zero, nil, nada etc and not giving sufficient means didn't do enough.

The Judiciary said careless, ...........not reckless, shameless or any other bloody-less, just careless.

Now nobhead Brown on the other hand has made his comments without thought or care for the consequences of his action, which is a bit reckless of him



You do have to worry about these peoples grasp of the English language especially when they refer to a Barm-cake as a Teacake (BTW for our trans-Pennine readers a Teacake has Currants in it, which tend to not work so well with chips babbysyed & peawet or bacon & egg as fillings)

slightly O/T: ........Lol at the profanity filter which edits out "barm-cake" (without the hyphen) as ""



HTH

Now that was late on Slater by Matai

Dont be silly. As Mr Brown has rightfully told us ruff Brits, that sort of thing does not happen in Aus.....EVER.

Just ask Mr Hopoate

And didn't they make a massive fuss of it down there! Oh wait....they said it was part of the game.

Then it comes back to Eddie, and suddenly it's extremely dangerous etc etc.

That was much later than Lockers one Robinson.

Exactly, it was late and a penalty was given, get on with it, its a tough game. Like you said its part of the game, especially in games like this. Well if people still want to kick up a fuss about the Lockers tackle i suggest they dont watch SoO because they will get very upset at the tackles and challenges that will go unpunished in those games....

Its just a good job Mark Geyer isnt still playing, he would get longer than sutcliffe these days!

Silverwood put it on report actuallY IIRC. Can't wait to see how many weeks he gets (or doesn't get) from the NRL disciplinary panel after Brown has been heaping praise on the Aussie's tougher stance on il-dicipline because IMO it was a similar shot but a hell of a lot later

Has he??? I didnt notice that.

He did yeah, but that means little coming from the ref these days because can't anything be called up?

Yeah, 10 incidents were looked at after our game with Huddersfield

This one's for Pongia.