You can see marshall foot in front of kicker which is by letter of the law offside also look at french trey look how your star player griffiths obstructs liam hood when he comes away from the scrum and hood is the last player to touch french had that been an official wigan player no try,typical of fans like you oh the mighty wigan lost cos of ref well worst team to many just did you...

If you say so but thats up for debate angles an all that if he flatvatvthe very best from behind he not flat level hence dont go to forward passes..2 things that aint up for debate is hood been obstructed by the referee which created a try for wigan and also the score line thats deffo no debate

You are correct Marshall is definitely onside... However your No. 10 is miles off and is clearly within the 10 when Jowitt tries to catch the kick. No try

No, Byrne is onside although I do see a puff of blue smoke coming from behind the grassy noll.

Me neither but i do see 27 26 in my fish n chip paper

Correct. You won. Woohoo. Well done. Good luck in your challenge cup semi final and end of season play off games.... Oh wait......

It is very strange coming on here giving it the big one when they’re in the position they are in. Least most of the other Wakefield fans know there’s still work to do and aren’t getting billy big just yet after their first piece of silverware (beating Wigan) Wakefield are always in the bottom table scrap and always done enough to scrape through, that’s the mentality of the club top to bottom scrape through. This year is a big worry however as the Championship side doesn’t share the same mentality, just their more successful neighbours.

Now you've gone and ruined fish n chips for me

Seriously, go and catch Cas!

Just watching it back, can someone tell me why Miski’s try wasn’t given on 15:15?

Clear knock on by Langi then immediately grounded by Miski

Having just the watched the match here are a couple thoughts.

Firstly, in light of a couple posts from Wakey fans, I need to address the reffing. If you want the very definition of "refereeing inconsistency" check out Wakefield's first kick of the game and the one that was penalised at the end. There is absolutely no difference yet one was given as a penalty. Neither was a penalty. Secondly, the last "knock on" that turned possession over was a disgraceful decision. In the end, credit to Wakefield for hanging in there when the game was "gone" but, ultimately, the game was gifted to them by two utterly ridiculous refereeing decisions.

On to Wigan.

There's nothing wrong with Cust per se, but unfortunately he adds nothing extra. Using a bench spot just to give O'Neil a 10 minute breather, especially for a team light on props, is tantamount to recklessness. Peet needs to be ruthless. I'm sure Cade is a great guy but enough already! Play the extra forward that we actually need. If O'Neill needs a break, slot Shorrocks in at dummy half for 10 minutes. An extra forward is FAR more useful to us than a "more of the same" interchange hooker for a few minutes a match.

Field MUST play 6. We abandoned that far too early. If he doesn't trust him defending in the line switch him and French around when defending. Bevan is far more effective at 1. Jai is far more effective than Bevan attacking in the line. For God's sake use the tools at our disposal to their best advantage. The "conundrum" is only that if we make it one, which is exactly what we're doing at the moment.

Mago was fine. The performance he put in at Wakefield would have been exactly what we need from a bench prop. Unfortunately, minus Cooper, Havard and Ellis, we're lacking too much firepower before he comes on. There isn't a simple answer but playing an extra forward would certainly help.

Nsemba has to play. He was the best back rower on the pitch. Again. I understand he and Hill are young but players will be back soon. Rest them then. Right now we need them on the pitch.

Congrats to Wakefield. The win could revitalise them for the back end of the season but I can't help feeling that was one that got away.