Explain.

I aint insulted you i might have said your clueless and this thread is stupid which i think it is


A question for you if all our team was fit who would you pick before hansen?

Clueless is an insult!
Your question is a different topic all together!

That is your opinion, personally I think the suggestion that he has been one of our best players is a bit far, he's a good squad player. The point is that Last Son has the right to his opinion and should not be lambasted for it being different to anybody elses!

Posters are now fabricating new questions and using them to attack me! It gets better! They don't seem to be able to understand the original post.

Ok if you take that as an insult i'm sorry

How is that question a different topic?

I posted this on page 2

What do you think my original post/point is?

Everyone gets your point but i think everyone wants to know why you have brought it up?

Your saying we haven't lost without him which is pretty much saying we dont need him when infact he's one of our best forwards for a second row the guy can shift and he's very strong he gives 100% week in week out

What I do not understand is why you needed to make this thread? If you think you have been vindicated in your original comments, congrats. Unfortunately the way you have acted has got a lot of backs up. Whilst you are entitled to your opinion, you did not need to rub what you think is a victory in everyone's face. Perhaps you wouldn't be "attacked" if you acted more maturely.

Personally I feel we have missed Hansen. If you do not believe this is the case and feel our wins whilst he has been out of action proves this, so be it.

Have we missed HH in terms of results? Fair enough, if you look at nothing but, no we haven't.

Have we missed HH in terms of the team's performance over 80 minutes in each of those games? Quite potentially. It's impossible to say for certain without a bleedin' time machine. He offers a hell of a lot to the squad when he's in it. He's very quick for a SR and is one of the best defenders in the league.

With the second point in mind (I'm not having a pop here, I'm just genuinely curious) who do you feel we have who wasn't in the squad when Hansen got injured "who can do what he can do?"

You're claiming that H hasn't been missed as we've been winning. We we're winning when Pat was out. We've been winning when Stu is out. Are they not missed?

The fact is that H, like Stu, like Liam Farrell and like Ryan Hoffman are all quality players that will be missed in some way by any team in the league. Saints for example have been winning without a million first team players (well, if you speak to Eddie Hemmings) but it doesn't mean they aren't missing them

What she said...

So I'm now not allowed to post a thread?

I'll explain. I posted it after the torrent of abuse I took for suggesting months ago that he wouldnt be missed. After win after win I decried to post my response outling that my point was more than valid.

This isn't the first time I've received pages of pages of abuse after a post- for example:
Discussing trying Sam as a FB
Looking to invest into Wigan based talent rather than overseas.

The way opinions in here are hammered, the way abuse is directed to one person is nothing short of a disgrace and should be looked at by the mods.

I would have never posted the OP if it wasn't for the abusive reaction it got the first time around.