Do your research, boys. Wakefield admitted they got that wrong, and if you read a bit more...

rlArticle by JAMES STOSIC HIMSELF in the Yorkshire Evening Postrl

Don't take it too hard, you tried your best to defend the thug.

Further light reading for you
rlWakefield's Stosic to soldier on with fractured eye socketrl
rlWakefield prop James Stosic is set to play in Sunday’s derby against Castleford with a fractured eye socketrl
rlJames Stosic made the bench despite fracturing his eye socket.rl
rlStosic suffered a broken eye socket after the incidentrl
rlJames Stosic should feature despite suffering a fractured eye socketrl
rlJames Stosic – playing despite a fractured eye socket – picked uprl
rlone player is defying a fractured eye socket in order to appear.rl

...But Stosic didn't suffer a fractured eye socket, oh no(!)

Some might say you were just well and truly pwned. But not me. I was simply right, and you were wrong, and that's life.

I see, so, the stick's still up there, rammed in good and tight.

Normal service is resumed. Saints fan can't argue with the overwhelming evidence, resorts to petty insults instead.

My kids went back to school last week, you pulling a sickie?

So a load of newspaper articles that clearly didn't pick up on the official club statement are more reliable than the official club statement which categorically states that a specialist had confirmed he HADN'T fractured his eye socket?

Do you know many other players who play the week after fracturing their eye socket? Got a link to Wakefield admitting they got it wrong in the original statement?

None of the links you provide have Wakefield saying he fractured his eye socket, my link categorically has them stating he didn't

Bottom line is Wakey cried wolf to get KC banned, then backtracked because there was nothing wrong with Stosic and made out like he's some sort of hero for soldiering on to save face.

You mean, Keiron Cunninghams kids?

Not quite.

You must admit, your stance on pretty much anything Saints and especially KC carries a somewhat negetive skew - one that far transcends any reasonable club bias. How is it termed on these boards - "Obsessed"?

Well, I can instantly think of one who carried on playing with a fractured eye socket and cheekbone...

Shaun Edwards at Wembley. Not sure about the week after though. I would think not.

The one and only Shaun Edwards, in the 1990 Cup Final v Warrington. It was the last match of the season in those days, so no.

Quote: Geoff "The one and only Shaun Edwards, in the 1990 Cup Final v Warrington. It was the last match of the season in those days, so no.'" we did play a premiership match the week after but lost to Bradford. wigan.rlfans.com/fusion_pages/in ... age_id=409 Bilko hasn't got the team for that one but I'd bet that Edwards didn't feature.

Quote: Geoff "The one and only Shaun Edwards, in the 1990 Cup Final v Warrington. It was the last match of the season in those days, so no.'" we did play a premiership match the week after but lost to Bradford. wigan.rlfans.com/fusion_pages/in ... age_id=409 Bilko hasn't got the team for that one but I'd bet that Edwards didn't feature.

You mean the ones that received the official press release rather than an unofficial website statement? BIG difference.



Try ringing them up. I did. They happily confirmed it was wrong.