FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Stuart Fielden - Time to retire? |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15795 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
16032_1698179828.jpg "[color=#800080:2tf4iz4f]BOHICA[/color:2tf4iz4f]":d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_16032.jpg |
|
| get rid asap
would rather have o'barrell in the team than the useless pudding that is stuart fielden
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1350 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2011 | Nov 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
34579_1267562925.jpg Saints: 100% Bitter, 0% Class:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_34579.jpg |
|
| Quote: The Wigan Observer "Anybody can select stats to suit their agenda Rogues Gallery.
I decided to compare like for like. Two experienced highly paid prop forwards. Whose stats are better.
rlhttps://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1
It is a shame there is not a RL Top Trumps set
Fielden is used in a different way to Peacock, Fielden is there in the Wigan side to compensate for Feka's lack of defensive qualities, that is why he comes on at the same time Feka does. feka's job is to carry the ball in, Fielden's is too cover for Feka, once Feka does at least 2 run's the opposition target him in the defensive line, Fielden's job is to protect him. IMO we would see a better Fielden if we got rid of Feka, as that not doing too happen he will keep having to do his thankless task, and keep taking the e from people like you. No offence.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 11377 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2960.jpg :2960.jpg |
|
| Quote: jjb10 "Fielden is used in a different way to Peacock, Fielden is there in the Wigan side to compensate for Feka's lack of defensive qualities, that is why he comes on at the same time Feka does. feka's job is to carry the ball in, Fielden's is too cover for Feka, once Feka does at least 2 run's the opposition target him in the defensive line, Fielden's job is to protect him. IMO we would see a better Fielden if we got rid of Feka, as that not doing too happen he will keep having to do his thankless task, and keep taking the poop from people like you. No offence.'"
None of that explains why Fielden is garbage when carrying the ball.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 29773 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
10919_1322084665.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10919.jpg |
|
| Quote: jjb10 "Fielden is used in a different way to Peacock, Fielden is there in the Wigan side to compensate for Feka's lack of defensive qualities, that is why he comes on at the same time Feka does. feka's job is to carry the ball in, Fielden's is too cover for Feka, once Feka does at least 2 run's the opposition target him in the defensive line, Fielden's job is to protect him. IMO we would see a better Fielden if we got rid of Feka, as that not doing too happen he will keep having to do his thankless task, and keep taking the poop from people like you. No offence.'"
If you truely believe that the worlds gone mad!
So Fielden is cack because Mason punched him, because he doesn't have 3 big units at the side of him like he did at Bradford, because of off-field trauma's, because of burn out, because he's lost his passion for the game and now because he's being used solely to drag Feka's ar*e through a game
In truth it's a mixture of a few of those but whatever way we look at it he's pretty much a spent force.
I'd consider him to be doing an ok job if he were on 60-70k a year but he's not, he's our highest paid and most experienced player so therefore he should be producing the very highest quality rugby.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 23 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2009 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: jjb10 "Fielden is used in a different way to Peacock, Fielden is there in the Wigan side to compensate for Feka's lack of defensive qualities, that is why he comes on at the same time Feka does. feka's job is to carry the ball in, Fielden's is too cover for Feka, once Feka does at least 2 run's the opposition target him in the defensive line, Fielden's job is to protect him. IMO we would see a better Fielden if we got rid of Feka, as that not doing too happen he will keep having to do his thankless task, and keep taking the poop from people like you. No offence.'"
Thankyou for the insult. I believe people are allowed to disagree?
Can I point out that your whole view is based on a misconception on your part. Namely, that Fielden and feka are a pair thay play together to produce a single player. A single player that costs nearly £500,000 pounds each season and leaves Wigan apparently with only 12 players v 13.
It is a misconception on your part because Fielden has not always come off the reserve bench alongside Feka. Very often Fielden started games until recently and of course when Feka goes off the field of play, Fielden is still there.
Even allowing for your misconception how is Jamie Peacock able to do both parts of the props job specification and Stuart Fielden can only do 1 or neither
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 23 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2009 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: FearTheVee "None of that explains why Fielden is garbage when carrying the ball.'"
Exactly. He has no natural feel for the sport because he started playing the game too late. He benefitted from having a great conditioner early in his career. The sport moved on and Fielden lost the conditioner who built him up physically.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 290 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
8905.jpg [quote="sT. tiEmPo":zxm4ql4m]Bernard Long has to be the funniest poster on RLFANS.com [/quote:zxm4ql4m]
[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3442187.stm:zxm4ql4m]Look Out, Look Out[/url:zxm4ql4m]
[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/3774411.stm:zxm4ql4m]Bernards About[/url:zxm4ql4m]:8905.jpg |
|
| Quote: The Wigan Observer "The sport moved on and Fielden lost the conditioner who built him up physically.'"
I had to leave for an overseas project at short notice. I'm sorry Stuart.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7779 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg Fans Forum 28.08.08 Fan from Haydock
"I've got one word for you Mr Chairman - Penalty Count"
[quote="The Daddy"]I've got one word for you all......Steve Hanley[/quote]
Some Salford fan said to me and I quote "You are by far and away the most Handsome & Knowledgeable Rugby League Fan in England!"
I thanked him and went on my Merry way!
RIVERCAVE DWELLER OF THE YEAR 2015!
"The club used you last night and didn't tell the truth."
Officially one of the 119 Mugs used by the club:icons077e_files/5454-3678dentheman-msnicons.jpg |
|
| Quote: NickyKiss "If you truely believe that the worlds gone mad!
So Fielden is cack because Mason punched him, because he doesn't have 3 big units at the side of him like he did at Bradford, because of off-field trauma's, because of burn out, because he's lost his passion for the game and now because he's being used solely to drag Feka's ar*e through a game
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 23 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2009 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| That he was overrated ?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 11377 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2960.jpg :2960.jpg |
|
| Quote: 100% Warrior "Very interesting points you have raised here - surprising too!
I think you've just thrown a spanner in the works
Really? Sounds to me like you're paying mega bucks for a player who does what a kid like Paul Clough does for Saints, probably for a 5th of the cash.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7439 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: FearTheVee "Really? Sounds to me like you're paying mega bucks for a player who does what a kid like Paul Clough does for Saints, probably for a 5th of the cash.'"
Yes really. I wouldn't of thought his metres gained per carry would be more or less on par with his one's at Bradford, nor would of thought his work in defence would be higher than his Bradford days.
It's not to say we should keep him nor am I trying to make out he's a world beater but it certainly does make surprising reading.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1350 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2011 | Nov 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
34579_1267562925.jpg Saints: 100% Bitter, 0% Class:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_34579.jpg |
|
| Quote: The Wigan Observer "misconception on your part. Namely, that Fielden and feka are a pair thay play together to produce a single player. A single player that costs nearly £500,000 pounds each season and leaves Wigan apparently with only 12 players v 13.
It is a misconception on your part because Fielden has not always come off the reserve bench alongside Feka. Very often Fielden started games until recently and of course when Feka goes off the field of play, Fielden is still there.
Even allowing for your misconception how is Jamie Peacock able to do both parts of the props job specification and Stuart Fielden can only do 1 or neither'"
Why is it mis conception?
1.Does Fielden come one with Feka. Yes
.
2.Does Fielden do more tackling when he is on the field than Feka. Yes.
3.Does Feka do 2 / 3 big runs tires then gets targeted in defence. Yes
4.Is Fielden hated because how much he cost? Yes.
Is the Leeds pack line of, Peacock, Burgess, Leuluai, Lauitiiti, Bailey & Buchcanan, better than ours? IMO yes.
Would Fielden play better in a big pack like Leeds and Warrington than he does in a light weight pack like ours. IMO yes.
Look at S. Burgess had a very good year the other year in a big Bradford pack, not had a good year in a light weight pack this year.
The 1st 4 points are fact, the others are my opinion. You can agree or disagree that's what a debate is about, but you cant doubt Facts.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 6722 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2015 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
The Communist Cap - dragging down success and aspiration to the levels of those who cba.: |
|
| Quote: The Wigan Observer "A single player that costs nearly £500,000 pounds each season and leaves Wigan apparently with only 12 players v 13.
It is a misconception on your part because Fielden has not always come off the reserve bench alongside Feka. Very often Fielden started games until recently and of course when Feka goes off the field of play, Fielden is still there.
Even allowing for your misconception how is Jamie Peacock able to do both parts of the props job specification and Stuart Fielden can only do 1 or neither'"
I presume you know that for certain?
I mean, you would lose any credibility you haven't got if you quoted that without actually knowing, wouldn't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|