I think it should’ve been addressed previously but I’d probably back them to show patience in the position now. Things to work on for Brad O’Neill but he’s come on leaps and bounds this season and Forber looks a real prospect. Those 2 young guys are a threat out of dummy half and I don’t think we can block their path.

Didn't he just get a slap on the wrist for doing that too?

Who is our cover at full-back if Field and French are unavailable? Marshall? Eckersley?

Possibly Hampshire.

Yes, of course, you're right. Forgot about him.

French not even cited so no issue. Hopefully we'll see a French-Hampshire-Smith lineup.

He lucky. I don’t think he connected with the player or the ball but still a stupid move

Had a feeling it would be a one game ban but not going to complain.

That’s a relief

Did Isa use one of the reserve games to serve his 2 match ban, or will he be missing v Leeds?

The reserves game and Hull count as his two games.

Good news, cheers Brian.

Yes but bonkers. But then the original ban was even more bonkers.

Isa and Hampshire for Nsemba and Shorrocks. Isa at 13 and Smithies at 8.

I keep thinking about what happens to Shorrocks when we have a stand off available and it feels like he deserves a spot somewhere in the 17 but I’m not sure where you’d fit him in. I’d go Isa and Farrell second row and KPP on the bench, O’Neill deserves a bench spot and you’d want a couple of props on there as well. The only way I could think of was Smithies to start at prop and Shorrocks to go in at loose forward. One thing is for sure, his time at 6 should now be over until the next times there’s an emergency.

Utility is his biggest asset and that's what will hold him back I think. He's not a player who thrives in one position and is capable of playing others. He's someone who can 'do a job' in several positions but doesn't really stand out in any. His performance against St Helens was a little overhyped really - some great defensive efforts and the coach smartly gave him a very limited and pre-defined role with the ball.

I recall a thread on the other forum after the Saints game, asking where he should play long term and some thought second row and some loose forward. I just said he’ll always be a utility and that is absolutely fine. I’d keep him at the club if we can, on a contract of a decent length but with no expectation that he nails down a position. He is a decent player in many positions but I don’t ever see him excelling in just one. If that is enough from his pov, I’m not sure but he’ll always have a sniff of a first 17 spot with his versatility.