What do you call the 100K for Gleeson then?



="Baked Bean BoogieIL is tighter than a nun's crotch'"

The irony that he would replace Gareth Hock?

I think we’ve got to find a middle ground to where we are. Some fans claim we are crap others claim we are unlucky others still think we are the best in the world. We aren’t any of those but I still do think were a squad that’s got a lot more potential than it’s showing.

We have a side that should be better than its current standing in the league that’s a fact. With a bit more luck, a little bit more creativity or composure at some points in this season and we’d be firmly planted in the top 8 imo.

But on the other hand not every signing can be a world class one.

On the subject of Warrington we can all laugh at them but seeing they were terrible at the start of this season and have made more progress over this season under Smith than we have under 3 years of Noble we shouldn’t be so smug.

It’s one of the things that keeps me going knowing that if Warrington can have instant improvements under a good coach then the players we have like Gleeson, Carmont, Tomkins, Fielden, Lockers, Feka and Roberts can as well.

one of him is bad enough

Tronc, Briscoe. If we just got those two i would be happy.

The more i look at it, the more i actually don't want us to sign a halfback, not because we don't need one, but because there isn't going to be anyone of the right standard available, and i'd rather just have another year with TL and tomkins in the halves than have someone [for example, although he's gone Long who isn't going to vastly improve us, and isn't going to be around for long.

This was my point, about 2months ago...

I believe we'll go for one of the two

1. One/ Two Props + 2nd Row - One prop if Coley signs a new deal, and 2nd Row the likes of Tickle/Wild/Ellis.

Or 2. One Prop and FB - N. Cayless/C. Webb with S. Briscoe or someone like C. Greenshields.

The only 6/7 I'd have out of all the ones available, would be Darren Lockyer, if he was to could tho, we'd have to sign a new sencond row to help protect him in defence, the likes of Mossop and Farrell, won't be up to that job.

hansen would be

I personally, would see the back of Hansen, adds very little in attack, apart the fact he runs quite good angles, although he does have a very good defence, he wouldn't be missed.

PR - N.Cayless
HK - Riddell
PR - Fielden
SR - Tickle
SR - O'Loughlin
LF - J. Tomkins

[uBench[/u
Feka
Macca
Coley
Mossop/Farrell/Flan

A pack I think we could see.

Hansen just seems to be heading backwards

It's completely baffling why people would rather us sign a full back than a half back.

Lenegan thus far at Wigan has been a big let down in the signings department.

Given how he likes to tell us how he's planning ahead, I'd have thought signings for next year should be done by now.

I sincerely hope some people are taking the p[ii[/iss with wanting to sign that thug Danny Tickle.

He's a disgrace to Wigan and should never pull on the cherry and white again.

(Not denying it just not sure I know what you mean.)

His thuggish-like behaviour (I have personal experience of this). I will be disgusted if Wigan sign him back again.