As much as I'm loathed to get involved in ridiculous petty squabbles, i pretty much agree with you.

I see you're not averse to lies of your own thenhttps://wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/2009/07/injury-update/rl

You must admit though, that was naughty from Tomkins.

Ooof!

Fishta, will that info loosen that stick that's up your ar5e?

The problem that day was the referee not shouting held, Tomkins had every right to make that tackle.

lol

Yes, he did.
However, the manner in which he attacked the side of the players knee was the concern. I'm sure if you aksed Sam about it, he'd admit it wasn't a very gracious bit of play and wasn't the best bit of judgement.
99% of the time rugby league's a man's game and (most of) the players follow a certain gentleman's conduct. The game's tough enough without finding easy ways to injure players (that incident could've caused worse injury than it did).
Imagine if a team (proabably leeds) started using a tactic were one tackler would hold the ball player stationary , then another would target the side of the knee like that. We'd see rules brought in like the ones to ban the chicken wing tackle.

I digress. Back to the thread.

The bottom line is - had KC done that to a held up Sam Tomkins and injured his knee - there would have been WWIII on here. It was cheap.

Given KC's got about 8 stone on Tomkins, he probably would have.

Do your research, boys. Wakefield admitted they got that wrong, and if you read a bit more...

rlArticle by JAMES STOSIC HIMSELF in the Yorkshire Evening Postrl

Don't take it too hard, you tried your best to defend the thug.

Further light reading for you
rlWakefield's Stosic to soldier on with fractured eye socketrl
rlWakefield prop James Stosic is set to play in Sunday’s derby against Castleford with a fractured eye socketrl
rlJames Stosic made the bench despite fracturing his eye socket.rl
rlStosic suffered a broken eye socket after the incidentrl
rlJames Stosic should feature despite suffering a fractured eye socketrl
rlJames Stosic – playing despite a fractured eye socket – picked uprl
rlone player is defying a fractured eye socket in order to appear.rl

...But Stosic didn't suffer a fractured eye socket, oh no(!)

Some might say you were just well and truly pwned. But not me. I was simply right, and you were wrong, and that's life.

I see, so, the stick's still up there, rammed in good and tight.

Normal service is resumed. Saints fan can't argue with the overwhelming evidence, resorts to petty insults instead.

My kids went back to school last week, you pulling a sickie?

So a load of newspaper articles that clearly didn't pick up on the official club statement are more reliable than the official club statement which categorically states that a specialist had confirmed he HADN'T fractured his eye socket?

Do you know many other players who play the week after fracturing their eye socket? Got a link to Wakefield admitting they got it wrong in the original statement?

None of the links you provide have Wakefield saying he fractured his eye socket, my link categorically has them stating he didn't

Bottom line is Wakey cried wolf to get KC banned, then backtracked because there was nothing wrong with Stosic and made out like he's some sort of hero for soldiering on to save face.

You mean, Keiron Cunninghams kids?

Not quite.

You must admit, your stance on pretty much anything Saints and especially KC carries a somewhat negetive skew - one that far transcends any reasonable club bias. How is it termed on these boards - "Obsessed"?