Quote DaveO="DaveO"The post said we spent 80% of the cap on a small number of players and you are saying something similar. Neither of you know who earned what. According to press reports Sam is the highest paid player at the club but no one is complaining about that. Even within the games £1.6m there will be players who earn six figure salaries and there will be inequalities. It's never been an issue that the top stars get the top wages. They still do. I really don't like the implication we should never offer say a £200K or £250K salary to an absolutely first class player. We can't have more than one of those but I think suggesting the signing of Barrett was a bad idea is nuts. Players like that put bums on seats.
Is our absolute maximum wage enough to tempt top Aussies or Kiwi's? I don't know. We may need to find players like Pat who actually wanted to come and sample a different lifestyle but whatever I don't accept we are doomed to forever be signing players of an average standard.'"
We did spend too large of a proportion on a relatively small amount of the Top players at the club.
Whether you want to believe that or not is up to you but the evidence and a lot of the information given by IL at the original Fans forum supported this theory.
We inheritted a situation due to the SL war in 95ish that meant we payed some really large salaries to key personnel i.e Connolly/Robinson/Farrell/Paul etc and it's no secret that we struggled to get under the original salary caps and had to negotiate with the RFL for dispensation (Something I agreed with).
However
When we then went out and spent large money on the Matty Johns and Renoufs of this world and then HAD TO stay within salary cap it was a time bomb waiting to go off.
For me what suffered at this point mid 2000's was the Off the field investments in youth and the ability to be patient and invest in youth due to being Top Heavy with salaries on the Top earners (We invested large amount of money in Vaeliki/Fletcher/Feka/Barrett/Fielden/Seu seu and I could go on).
I believe this was a result of the pressure building to actually win something short term and when the injuries and other situations kicked in the cards came tumbling down.
IL's idea was to remove the reliance on the top earners and filter a lot more of the money through the youth players and invest in them long term.
I argued with a Saints fan in Oz at the world cup in 2008 (It wasnt JLM23 who comes on here but he was stood with us and actually agreed) that in 2 years Wigan would be a better team/club than Saints.
It would just take a bit of patience and the chance for the youth to develop.
This has led to a better cycle of talent coming through the club and less reliance on siging Top talent from elsewhere that leads to Top money being shelled out.
Your spot on about Tomkins being a Big earner but we all know the negotiations and work Wigan had to put in to keep him and get the salary cap amended etc to keep him.
If we are going to pay Top money then I for one am glad it's on Juniors that have come through the ranks wherever possible and show more of a commitment to the club in general.
Tomkins is top drawer and as good as anything Ive seen at Wigan and I for one wouldn't like to think we ever lost someone like that in the future due to not being able to pay him what he's worth when he's in his teens as we try and chase short term success.