Interesting in terms of "thought processes" to get there. I never said it was the most interesting point on the forum.

Under your scenario they couldn't pick Wigan and instead of choosing the team they beat the previous week would instead pick the team who has beaten them three times this season and the highest ranked club in the play-offs. As I said, "interesting".

you wrote 'interesting' and what you meant was 'complete b0llocks'

Leeds in the playoffs and Leeds in the regular system are chalk and cheese.

This!

Yes, because the performance of Leeds in the regular rounds and their performance in the playoffs has been identical over the last few seasons hasn't it?

You may be surprised to hear that the one time Leeds have had Clubcall, they chose the lowest ranked team.

Not the issue.

Think you might need to explain that a little more for it to make any sense whatsoever.

to be fair he did say may be, however on top of all the logical arguements against this, Wigan would also play an extra match, and with our injuries and potential suspensions its highly unlikely losing is better.
Question: would it be better for Leeds or the Wires to lose - ignoring the extra match? I cant see it but maybe someone can?

If we win tomorrow, it will guarantee us a home tie in the semis, therefore Leeds / Warrington couldn't select us as you can't be done out of a home tie (even though we could be the lowest place team).
That's my reading of it, comments?

Isnt that why we couldnt pick Warrington last year because they won their semi?

Yes, the team with the club call only get a choice of two, the two teams who win in the knockout games played next week

They couldn't select us but they could select Hudds therefore sending the other to us.

Warrington lost their first game last year to St Helens. But won the next. So the choice then was Warrington or Leeds.