one then the second time we broke it due to a made up rule. So once really.

Huh? That's confused me. How did Peacock cheat ? By tackling little Sam ? Isn't that allowed now ?

Not with a clothes line no.

Round the neck? No its not....

Nobodies tackle on Sam led to Wigan losing that game.

HTH.

If you can't see anything wrong with that "tackle"...

Be interesting to see if you'd be of the same opinion if Joel Tomkins does it to Burrow on Saturday night and leeds lose. Especially if he high-fives his team mates afterward and escapes all sanction.

It was a quality tackle by a quality player - a true giant of the modern game. It lead directly to Wigan losing the game.

See above. Not repeating myself.

Wrong again

And you're a quality poster. Get a grip man, you're making a fool of yourself.

You're right, it has been done to death and it's completely irrelevant to this conversation.

The spark to this argument was the rather ridiculous assertion - made initially by Slaphead and now by Peacock - that McGuire's illegal act wasn't illegal at all and that McGuire is somehow the victim.

To try and make the big story in this the fact that two frustrated Wigan players called McGuire a cheating little get is a schoolyard tactic that has fooled no-one. To then try and justify what McGuire did with a nonsensical lie that he only grabbed Carmont to try and balance himself suggests that you guys must think the rest of us have as much between our ears as Peacock does.

Awesome. In that case - if/when one of the Wigan players hit a leeds half back with a blatantly high swinging arm to the head, you won't come on here and complain or demand that he should have been sent off. After all, it will just be a quality tackle by a quality player who is a member of the most successful RL team of all time.

You can't have it both ways

* IT'S ''THEAR'', THICKO!

You simply COULD NOT make it up.