It was along way to run just to give somebody a push as well

now your making it sound like he tripped over his own feet. Either way it was illegal and there was intent in what Bridge did. Moa got a couple match suspension for somthing that is legal but was mistimed. However I think 1 match is too soft and 2 is too harsh so probaly a 1 match ban and £500 fine.

But if I was a coach my tactic against Wolves is run at bridge. You'll get penalties every set.

Look at their next three fixtures. He'll get at least one game, possibly two, but definitely not 3.

1 match ban. He'll appeal and get off

How can an incident be worth a 1 match ban but not a red card? That doesnt make sense. If a player is banned for a game then his team get to play with a full quota of players in the game of the offence and the following game?

You have to understand the Disciplinary procedure. Early plea, 1 match ban. It's hard to appeal against something you've pleaded guilty to.

There are 29 pages on the VT about something similar. Personally I think he should have been off. However he wasn't. Unfortunately life in general isn't fair.

I would have liked a yellow and a stearn warning, and hopefully his team mates would have been punished during the game. Its the lack of balls the refs have that annoys me the most.

I'd agree with that, however it doesn't exactly help when a player is sent off and there's an outcry.

But sport is supposed to be, especially when you have a referee on the spot, touchjudges on either flank and the Sky cameras trained on you from virtually point-blank range, plus a VR facility.

didn't Ganso use the vr to send off Moz for GB at the JJB and when he sent Raynor off for that punch/tackle in the CC?

It was the TJ who watched the replay on the screen of the Moz one and then told Ganson.