as long as there are idiots on here choosing to pick on every tiny detail someone says, who continually goes on a crusade to exact a vile and bloody tirade of abuse at someone's post merely because they do not agree with it, then I will continue to amuse myself how I wish i'm afraid.

Problem is, your talking B0llarks.

The internet is funny.... You can read what people write, and it's not what they say, but how they say it.... And you think, they seem a bit of an ar$e

Oh, give me a break.

A vile and bloody tirade!

What planet are you on?

However, if you feel you're being bullied, fair enough ... we'll leave it there.

But let's just recall what all this was about. You called the club chairman a numpty, citing your own 'financial expertise' as justification. I simply pointed out that you have no expertise where Wigan RL is concerned because you're not party to the inner
financial dealings at the club. All you can do - all any of us can ever do - is guess.

And be honest ... the examples you cited of IL's incompetence - the transfer fee for Anthony Gelling (which no one was likely to have paid, even though it would have been minimal!) and the idea that we should fork out a fortune for Sam just so we can sell him on at profit somewhere down the line (when he's in his mid-30s!) are non-too-persuasive arguments. Nor are they indicative of a great financial mind.

Lots of questions here mate so let me start at the top and work down.

Would I have offered big buck contracts to Williams and TT? I would have done whatever it took to keep Williams yes. I would have offered TT a new deal based on his form that season. I’m not sure he’s on big money?

You would have re-signed sarge? Yes, given that Gelling had gone and we had no centre, I’d say he was as good as we could have hoped for in those circumstances. I didn’t expect his form and injury issues to be so poor.

you would have allowed it to get to a point where Bateman is practically on his way out? Bateman signed a 5 year deal with an NRL clause which was a great move by Wigan. We secured a top player for 3 years minimum which he has honoured. If he goes it won’t be to a rival club and we make money from the deal. That’s just good business all round.

You would have re-signed JT? In hindsight probably not because his form never really lived up to expectations but at the time of his return I definitely would have done so. We needed a boost in the pack, added size and speed and JT could have provided that. Needless to say, injuries impacted massively on his 2nd stint.

you would have let smith go when we had no straight replacement? I’d have packed his bags for him and given him a lift to wherever he wanted to go!! The biggest mistake with Smith was signing him in the first place.

You would have not shown an interest in drinkwater, or watts when available? Drinkwater yes. I said so after the preseason friendly this year. Watts, no chance. He’s not a bad prop but he’s thicker than a blind cobblers thumb and probably will never learn!

All in all I’d say Mr Lenegan has been outstanding in his running of the club, contracts included and still I await your evidence of mismanagement of contracts.

didn't you get the message about me exaggerating? it seems that what everyone thinks on here, so i thought i'd have some fun with it.

again, I will stand by my word when I say I did not call the chairman a numpy, you assumed I did. if you took notice of the content of my responses you would know that. like I say, you just pick up on what you think will give your ego the biggest boost.

also, I never claimed you were bullying me, i'm a grown man with children out of school, i can stand on my own feet thank you - I merely claimed you were a bully.

and once again, if you care to take a look through the books as detailed on Companies House you will see for yourself that the club is spending way too much on something we don't know what it is spending it on. a turnover of £7M yet not making profits? like I say, something is amiss and i'm not saying negligence or something foul is afoot, I am merely concerned how we can be bringing in so much yet have to rely on IL etc more and more. what else is there to assume has gone on other than mismanagement of contracts etc? surely that is one of the highest costs of the club? it is simple to suggest that is why I have come to this conclusion.

again i'll reiterate one last time, if you can come back to me with valid responses to my questions i'll be happy to continue. after all, my first post on this topic was exactly that, a question. you know, where someone asks for help and then hopes to receive it? its everything you haven't done so far.

again you guys keep bringing up IL. I never pointed my finger at him, I said something at the club was amiss.

TT is on a good wage, he signed on a good wage and has probably had it increased at wigan when he signed his contract after a handful of decent games for us, since then he has been poor.

we re-signed sarge exactly because we had no room to do anything else, because we'd already blown our money on JT, ST, GW, TT etc.

the fact you didn't rate smith who contributed to a lot of success at the club with blake green by his side says a lot about your opinion. on his own, yes, he wasn't up to scratch. but it is clear to everyone that with the right partner he was at times up there with the leagues best. I suppose you'll forgive him the silverware he helped bring to the club with an opinion like that. yeah lets just pretend that didn't happen while he was a wigan player.

and to have had bateman for 3 years when we have had someone like lockers all his life, yeah i'm sorry that's not good business by wigan. KEEPING bateman would be good business. letting him leave for the clause payment would be good financially but that is all, we'd struggle to get a ready replacement for him with the same passion for the club and game. and I doubt we'd be willing to spend the same kind of money either.

all in all considering the valid points I've made, of course in reply to your valid points, I still maintain I have justified why I feel what I do. we don't have to agree, but i'm simply not happy being told i'm wrong when all i'm doing is put across my opinion.

You have taken my comment out of context, it was a joke as you said "All", and i said i had not complained.... But if it suits your argument, have fun..

So how do you explain this quote from yesterday ...

[iat no point did I profess to suggest gelling was up to no good by getting out of his contract. my point is, Wigan have not benefitted from it in any way - again - my point refers to the numpty who is controlling all of this at Wigan. my point refers to what the bloody hell is going on, and has been for the last year or two![/i

You little fibber, saying you never called him a numpty.

Or is it the case that actually IL is not in charge? Is he like Gary Hetherington with someone else behind the scenes pulling his strings?

"Again i'll reiterate one last time, if you can come back to me with valid responses to my questions i'll be happy to continue."

You mean as I have above?

Wow, your admiration of Smith is staggering. Apart from effort and perhaps 1 good game a season he gave us nothing. We won trophies in spite of him, certainly not because of him. He was a senior player in our squad and others should have been able to turn to him when we were up against it. Instead he offered nothing and the fact he needed Green along side to carry him through games speaks volumes about his lack of ability. He got a few good drop goals which we wouldn’t have needed if he could create an opportunity to score a try and using your Smith methodology, Sarginson is a world beater because of his grand final winning performance against Warrington!

To try to compare Lockers to Bateman is laughable. Lockers is a local lad playing for his hometown club and chose to stay at Wigan. He had many offer to go to the NRL (as did Roby at Saints) but they didn’t want to go for family reasons. Bateman is a completely different kettle of fish with the biggest difference being he wants to go to the NRL. I refer to IL because as chairman any mismanagement of contracts is ultimately down to him. I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on this, I’m more than happy with the way the club has handled player contracts in recent years.

Bringing this to a conclusion though, I think much will be said about the club depending on how we look next season when we’ll see if the club is being managed well. I’m happy with ZH and I’m happy with Greenwood (although I don’t think he has the x-factor). Interesting couple of months ahead.

IL is present for the signing of contracts, he is not during contract negotiations. my point stands.

it suited it perfectly well thank you, considering you claimed I exaggerated then went on to say that i'd been "told this 10 million times already".