His quick feet to leave Lomax on his rump was one of my fav parts of the game.
He's been playing lower level, then is asked to step in in pretty much the highest standard game possible in SL, and to play out of position on the wing. I wouldn't judge him too harshly.

Hankinson was far from our worste player yesterday.

I would play him again at centre on Monday

I wouldn’t have him selling hot dogs.

Take it you haven't seen the Salford game.

I’d have Hankinson at second row over Isa any day

Moment of reflection needed on here. Arguing over the merits of Isa or Hankinson. Thank you to Lenegan and Radlinski for this golden moment in our history.

The point is Hankinson and Isa are both behind Farrell and Greenwood in the 2nd row.
If one of those two are missing I'd prefer Hankinson over Isa, that's all.
For third choice both are capable under a capped salary bill.

Not sure what basis anybody could have for saying they’d play Hankinson over Isa in the backrow all on the back of a short spell at Salford on Easter Monday. It’s just a hunch pick with no basis or previous form to back it up.

You may as well say you’d prefer Escare at hooker over Powell even though he’s never played there just because it’s Powell.

I have nothing against us looking at Hankinson at second row by the way but at least give him and Isa a few games before giving a judgment.

What have Isa & Hankinson got to do with Edwards being a coward who reneges on a deal and IL yet again being found out announcing the signing of a non-existent contract?

Bloody ell Mathers

Me too. He was very good in his spell at Salford and was a key part of our match winning try. He’s big enough and he’s quick. He’s also used to playing on the right.

I’d also leave Smithies in ahead of Isa but I’m conscious he’s still 18 and developing. Wouldn’t want to burn him out through playing too many games.