No!

SOME PEOPLE WANTED HIS HEAD ON A STICK!

Not all of us!
And TBH it doesnt matter if someone did or didn't.

It still stands, Noble should pick the team he thinks will win that game. He will live & Die by that decision.

, : . ! ? ;

Well Said

At times i think Nobles dog must have bit some one her or when he was a policeman he must have wrongly arrested some there is so much resentment against the man.

Looking at the rule I'm pretty sure Ainscough's "salary cap value" as determined by the RFL will already have taken this into account using a defined formula.

Not bothered about him missing the game , just hope noble doesnt keep publicly criticisng him - Ainscough is the only player singled out for criticsm in nobs 3 years here - Fielden has never been dropped but is constantly sh*t. Ainscough has a long bright future ahead of him , unlike noble who will probably go if we lose on saturday.

Your wrong, Fielden got dropped once but refused to play for the reserves so Eamon was sacrificed IIRC.

If that's true that is shocking.

Also I'm told there's no truth re the SC and leaving Ainy out is completely tactical.

When was this?? If so noble should of told him where to go..

well i was speaking someone at murryfield who was told by ainscough's dad that if he plays more than 10 games his money goes up

It was yonks ago, i think if not early last year then late the year before.

you'll never please all the fans all the time.we have an opinion, and the fans will all have different ideas of whats right and wrong. makes for a good sport and good debate.

As much as I was pee'd of with BN for dropping SA last week I could see his reasons behind it. My big problem this week would be if he dropped Michael McIlorum for Riddell. MM took on the best 2 hookers in the league last week and was head and shoulders above both of them, the rotation with him and TL, TS and ST is working brilliantly so why change that formation just to bring in a bloke who has yet to REALLY impress this season?

Well A he deserves it B Wigan should of known it when they signed Gleeson and C we shouldnt be prevented from playing young british players. If it is the reason it is a disgrace

I think its really unfair on SA and shows that BN didnt have much faith in his ability to break the first team and have such an impact but as good as many knew he was not many expected him to tear it up so much, BN also said S.Tomkins would only get 10 games this season i wonder if his deal is similar and they are obvioulsy going to have to bump up his wage.

I have heard that its due to Seans contract, once he make a certain amount of 1st team games then his wage increases. This wouldve been fine if it where not for the signing of a Mr gleeson which by all accounts has taken us to the limit of the salary cap.

As a result noble is probably saving sean for when injurys hit the squad.

could be wrong but thats what i heard