Quote: Cruncher "Utterly amazing post to start this thread.
I'm sure it's already been said by everyone else on here, but the OP either knows nothing at all about Rugby League or has an agenda, or maybe a bit of both (perish the thought).'"
I'll break my original post down then.
[iUsual fayre in a big game where we come up short. [/i
Lots of big games in the last 18 months we have the ball, look solid with it and then failed to capitalise when really we should've been clear with territory and possession taken into account. This year we've drawn against Wire (h), lost against Hudds (a), lost against Leeds (a) and now lost against Wire (a). These are the three teams we'll directly come up against and it paints a sorry picture. Yes it's great the youngsters are getting experience and we can all take some positives if we look hard enough but bottom line is we don't win the crunch big games consistently enough. Warrington had a fair few seasoned pros missing too which seems to have gone amiss.
[iMatty Smith outstanding tonight but not good enough as a team to take the two points.[/i
Self-explanatory really, he was a proper general on the field and has really stepped up after criticism about his ability to replace Leuluai. As for not being good enough, well we weren't! Sam kicking the ball to Charnley was the turning point and we lost territory after that. Not using Williams and then Spencer (who clearly had a shocker) meant we played about 65 minutes with 15 men, which is why Higham looked a world beater towards the end.
Some of the false praise does need a dose of reality. We're in a results business and yes we were missing major players in some key positions but it's a bit annoying when we are starting to look like a set of flat-track bullies.