Well I was made up with the win

The discipline which has been shocking, was greatly improved. Only 5 penalties?

Mossops display was very good as was Joel in the first half.

And am I the only one who thought Powell did ok?

Burke is ideally suited to playing 13 in our system IMO and I'd love to have him in the team now. He would organise that middle far better and get quality ball out to the backline.

He's another Hampshire for me in that I've never understood why he's not been given more opportunities. I was hugely impressed when he first broke in the first team. He played a few games and then got left out for one and that was pretty much that.

With Lockers injury record he should definitely be back with Wigan next year.

Quote Aboveusonlypie="Aboveusonlypie"Well I was made up with the win The discipline which has been shocking, was greatly improved. Only 5 penalties? Mossops display was very good as was Joel in the first half. And am I the only one who thought Powell did ok?'" Stats from last night. Impressive from Tony Clubb. www.superleague.co.uk/report/11058 We need to start putting the chances away, that game should have been out of sight by 20 points plus in the first half. Then Hull scored early on in the second half and the team (and crowd) got very nervous. Fair play to Matty Smith I thought he had a much better game last night, but I'm not sure if the Smith - Powell combination is the right one as they are similar players.

Quote Aboveusonlypie="Aboveusonlypie"Well I was made up with the win The discipline which has been shocking, was greatly improved. Only 5 penalties? Mossops display was very good as was Joel in the first half. And am I the only one who thought Powell did ok?'" Stats from last night. Impressive from Tony Clubb. www.superleague.co.uk/report/11058 We need to start putting the chances away, that game should have been out of sight by 20 points plus in the first half. Then Hull scored early on in the second half and the team (and crowd) got very nervous. Fair play to Matty Smith I thought he had a much better game last night, but I'm not sure if the Smith - Powell combination is the right one as they are similar players.

That's what concerns me about the pairing too. With both of those players the defence is never going to expect them to take them on because they are always expecting a pass. That's a great opportunity for them to actually take the line on and catch the defence out but neither really looks interested in doing that.
I didn't think Williams was doing a bad job at stand off considering he was playing behind a poor pack. Last night we actually had two props who were causing problems and so it's no surprise that we got a little more out of Smith, but I can't help but wonder whether we'd also have seen more from Williams.
I still think Hampshire and Williams would compliment Smith better than Powell as both can threaten with ball in hand and trouble defences.

I would have to see it again but I remember thinking that he wasn't square at the time before the penalty was blown. here is the proper wording of the rule you are referring to, which doesn't apply in yesterday's case because there was no dummy half

In their defence both Powell and Smith took the line on last night.

The ref signalled that Faz was not square. The penalty wasn't because he wasn't allowed to dive on the ball.

We won the same fixture last year 56-10.

The team then was Williams and Smith in the halves (no Green), Powell at hooker (swapping with Williams), Tierney at full-back and Jordan James one of the interchange props.

So what is the issue now? The team last night was as good as or even better than in last year's win.

hulls team?

In your comments on the Hull match last year you ask what is the issue now ?,maybe because a certain player played in the No 13 shirt in that match (Lockers).

The statement I have just made disturbs me, if we are so reliant on one player and this is confirmed by a lot of posters on here saying we are missing him, what happens when the time comes when he does not come back ?.
Over the last couple of seasons he has missed a lot of games and then got himself half right for the big games, when even then he sometimes seems half fit.
In the present squad we do not have a player with the depth of skill and the respect of the other players to take that role on when the inevitable comes.(which in my opinion will be sooner rather than later).

But posters keep on saying we will be ok when Lockers comes back.

That is why the present talk about the halfbacks is tied up with the absence of Lockers (which no body knows when it will become permanent) , we played yesterday two halfbacks who could be called steady halfbacks. Which of those would have done what Lockers did last year in the Premiership semi against the Wire when the scores were level ?, in the last minute he took the ball from MM on the last tackle and went blind and swung a long pass on the last tackle for Burgess to go in at the corner.

We have got to have a player who can try to do the unexpected and in the present team we do not have anybody playing in his right full position who can do this.

You really think Hull were the reason we didn't score more on Friday?

I tend to agree.

Think someone (maybe Bilko) posted a stat on here a while ago on our win % with and without Lockers and it is awful reading.