It was Cullen that signed Morley.

Well the short answer to this is, of course, "we'll never know". But given that He, Ellis and Burgess all ripped it up from their first seasons in the NRL, I think it's fair to say the evidence suggests that he would. In addition, Madge coached in superleage. He's now coaching at Souths. Does that mean the coaching he gave at Wigan was somehow, by default, worse than he will be giving at Souths, just because it was carried out in the Superleage? Obviously not. I understand and agree with the argument that the tougher standards in the NRL will always give players an extra few percent when it comes to the tight games, but I'm not sure how that would be so much benefit to an English club that it's worth losing 3-5 years of a player in his prime.

It was Cullen that signed Morley.

Apologies it was, same principle though

I think this is a much overused argument. Does anyone truly believe, in this day and age, that coaches this side of the pond aren't able to find out the most recent techniques in any given disciplne? Seriously? That's before we get on to the fact that many coaches, incluuding as I say above, our very own Madge operate in the Superleague on a regular basis anyway. There's 2 new coaches from Aus started this year on Humberide, one, I believe, with backroom SOO experience! Apart from which; let's assume the players can impart some snippets of wisdom, on their return from Aus. We already have a steady stream of Australian and NZ players coming over. Are you saying that, for example, Morley can give better information regarding training techniques etc, several years after returning from Aus, than could the dozen or more Aussies that were plying their trade in the NRL as recently as last season? Again, the obviousl answer is "no"

I'm not sure why people keep using this argument. It simply doesn't hold water.

The only player who could be considered to have "ripped it up" during their first season in the NRL would be Ellis. Morley by his own admission struggled during his first season.

Perhaps Ellis fitted in better as he was older when he went to the NRL.

Without reading all of this, I would have him in a heart beat, and be more than comfortable with a 3 year deal. Ellis is a truly worldclass player in every sense of the word, he is also a model professional.

He would bring that Phil Bailey type impact behind the scenes and a real positive impact on the field. I appreciate we have a wealth of secondrow's but it is not often worldclass players become available with so much still to offer.

Having said that do I think he will come to us....no, we will be priced out of the market if we were interested by clubs in a more dire need for secondrow players. Every club though in SL must be interested, they would be mad not to be. Absolute quality in everything he does.

Why would it be denying a home grown player a place in the squad given we don't have a squad made up of entirely home grown players?

If he is better than the likes of Flower or Lauaki why would we not improve our squad by signing him if we could?

In fact if a player becomes available that improves our squad and we can sign him then we should sign him regardless of who he replaces in the squad, whether the player that losses out is home grown or not. That is the ruthless and professional mentality that got Wigan to the top in the 80's and 90's.

Would Ellis improve the squad? Don't know but that has got to be the only consideration.

Oh, and the idea we would sign any player to deny other clubs his services given there is a salary cap is a joke.

The only factor that we struggle with is the intensity of the games. Too many easy games that allow players to drop off in their performances does the national team no favours. I am not convinced about the Exiles concept, can it continue to grow or will it fall by the wayside. The top players need to be tested more than an handful of games a season.

I think you'll find that Burgess has been an outstanding success too.

"It has been said in the media that "Sam Burgess is the best Pommie to come out here in 20 years" meaning he is the best English exported player to play in the NRL for 20 years." is one quote and, from Souths own websiteany world class, or potential world class, player to the NRL is a loss to Superleage. The relative benefits of getting that player back at the tail end of his career is dwarfed by the loss to the competition by his being in another competition during his prime years. I can simplify this analogy. Would the people who are advocating this as a good thing accept it so readily if the players were going to Union for the best part of their careers and returning as marginally better players for a couple years prior to retirement? That's if you even accept the premise that the players return as 'better' players. For my money, as good as he still is, Morley was a 'better' player during his stint in Australia. He would still have been better during that time than he is now had he stayed in England and the rest of Superleague would have benefitted by playing against him in his prime.

Gary Hetherington already been to Australia in January and said that he was looking for a 'marquee' signing for the 2013 season..