Tuson did nothing in the saints game and still got banned, this is the RFL

The dream ticket, Bentham/Ganson, could be a very, very frustrating afternoon. The script has already been written and the result known only to the chosen few.

Yep, identical types of alleged foul play there - well done.

An absolute joke if he is banned for this considering things like lynch's forearm/elbow to the face....

be gutted if he does miss the final as he has been great all season and would be missed... but atleast we have the strength in depth to be able to replace him with the likes of farrell or hock... so i dont think it would affect us as much as the rfl/leeds would hope!

They don't charge people and find them not guilty, that's why they review the games before charging people. Saying that I do hope he gets a warning, but I doubt it 2 matches along with Solomona for the same offence

I cant believe how Hansen has been charged yet McGoldrick gets away with two offences. Ok one wasn't that bad but he cant away with performing a DDT on a rugby pitch! Along with Lynch's forearm into McIlorum which even the SKY team picked up, it makes you think if the RFL really do review the games or just watch Wigan

I'm expecting a one match ban.

A suspended sentence would be the decent thing to do. It would be a shame if he couldn’t make it to Wembley.

Another gem from the latest one-match-a-year wonder to emerge from the Leeds woodwork now that it's Wembley week.

If you'd actually watched the game in which the Ablett incident you refer to occurred, you'd realise what a buffoon you've just made of yourself.

Don't think a warning is an option for a Grade B offence. Minimum punishment is a one match ban so a not guilty or no case to answer verdict is what HH needs to hear to be available on Saturday

That's fair enough, so if they are to consistent they will get the same treatment. Just don't understand how they can miss other incidents which are so blatant and I've never known a disciplinary panel to get so many things wrong in one sport before.

I don't expect a ban. He will, undeservedly in my opinion be found guilty and as somebody has stated a one match ban is the minimum punishment. However they often go outside the recommended range of sanctions due to mitigating factors, these include plea and previous record, I have a feeling Hansen will gamble and plead guilty to gain credit and will ultimately escape a ban due to his exempalory record

I also think that if they give him a one match as is possible, Wigan will appeal the severity of the sentence resulting in an increased fine and allowing him to play

2.8 SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR EACH GRADE OF OFFENCE

GRADE NORMAL SUSPENSION RANGE
A SOS/NFA -1
B 1 – 2
C 2 -3
D 3-5
E 4-8
F 8+ or period suspension

2.9 NORMAL SUSPENSION RANGES – GUIDELINES ONLY

Players and Clubs should be aware that the normal suspension ranges are guidelines only and
the Tribunal has the discretion to step outside of the normal ranges in the following three
circumstances

no news?
thought he was up at 5:30pm?