Rogues is knighted by the dark side rlhttp://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f

???????????

Which bit are you struggling with ?

Zombie, did I miss the bit where this became a comparison between half backs? It would see stupid to include a full back in that debate, don't you think?

Agreed.

I was pointing out that that is how the debate started.
I'm sure a few would deny that now tho...

As a half back myler is the better of the three.

Tomkins is the better fullback and had the most impact this year.

Eastmond still had thr most potential for me. Just looks very unlikely to fulfill it due to his attitude.

myler is not better than Tomkins and has shown himself to be little more than another average support player.

The bit I underlined.

'Hands down' Myler is a better halfback?

I'd sooner have Sam at 6 or 7 any day than Myler.

But everyone's entitled to a view. I just don't agree with yours on this matter.

Come again?

Myler isn't better than Jonny Lomax, never mind Sam Tomkins.

Eastmond is a good un and it's a shame he's gone but he was never better than Sam.

The comments though in the original post, just go to show how bitter and twisted some posters are. They must go to bed each night and pray that all things Wigan are obliterated from the earth. Suppose it's the old british thing of, whilst not exactly admiring failure they just hate success.

I wouldn't bother. This is the poster who stated on the Wire board that Matt King is better than Pat Richards. Some people just have the tinted specs superglued on...

Tomkins is a great player, he'll make a break out of nothing, one flaw he does have though is he's not much of a passer, when Sammy boy gets that ball he won't let go unless he's about to have his head taken off, hands like velcro!

Funnily enough, I didn't see him say any of that, just that Matt King is no better than Pat Rcihards, which is true.

Your extremely raw nerves are duly noted.