If you'd actually bothered to read the previous "warning" you'd see it had nothing to do with what he has now been charged with, therefore as per usual when Wigan gets in the way for you, you're talking complete and utter crapola.

Shenton was cited three times last year while he was at Cas. Two high tackles and a grapple tackle

That doesn't count - it fails to fit in with his attempt to paint Wigan as the great evil of RL.

Maybe we could find some mystery other camera angle like Leeds had for Buderus last year after his ban in the first playoff game.

I think Lima will get hammered because of the 'wrestling' that we supposedly do.

he will get another ban. we will just have to live with it

But the incident itself does not warrant a ban.

I think Lima will get hammered because of the big stink that's been kicked up over the whole thing. The RFL will want to be seen to be doing some thing to stamp out this new "evil, career-threatening" tackling technique that is has been creeping into our game since 1895

I think your talking about an era of rugby that we are not allowed to talk about among certain oppositon fans

Got to say the media do crucify us, between Punch and Judy on Sky, Wilkin adding his 2 pence worth, the sheep botherers on the Super League Show and Old Man Kear attacking us this week, is it any wonder that we Wigan fans feel that we're screwed over at every opportunity. Not one media voice has pointed out the reality, yes it was a very poor tackle technique but to claim it was anyway malicious is ridiculous!

Kear should focus more on coaching his own team rather than worrying about how we play the game. Hopefully the RFL will see sense and banish the shower to the Championship (I can dream!), then he can compare notes with Millward about how badly they were treated by Mo and Dave in the past!

Can't see Lima getting anything less than 3 games folowing the furore

Was he found guilty? It isn't the citing, it's the guilt which makes the difference.

I did read the warning.

I suggested reasons for the difference in treatment. They may be the reasons or they may not be the reasons. Lima may not be found guilty. Who knows?

Who cares? Not me!

And there should endeth your 'contributions' to this thread.