Bit of a daft one, like you say he makes the call and all the players can do is react to that. Coley is no slouch is he?!

Went mad when they went to the screen. If it had been turned down it would have been a penalty to wire which would have been a disgrace as it would have been silverwoods error not Carmonts.

That sort of incident should be chalked off the list of things you can look at like forward passes.

Rubbish, you would have been fuming if we had scored a try in a similar situation then later you had gone home and watched the recording only to find that the try should never have been awarded.

Its called common sense, use the technology if its there. It was a close call, their is no way the ref could have called that in real time.

If the ref waves play on. What is George meant to do? Stop and say sorry ref I was tackled I'll play it? No, because that would be a penalty. He plays on and later finds that that is a penalty because the ref cocked up?

IF he was tackled then it should have been a ptb but we all know it would have been a penalty which would have been harsh to say the least.

How can it be a penalty to Warrington against Carmont for doing as the ref tells him? Had he played the ball assuming he was tackled it would be a penalty against him. Had the video ref deemed he had been tackled it should have been a play the ball to Wigan back where the tackle was made, otherwise it's a bit of a farce.

Something similiar happened in 2005 (IIRC) but in reverse.

Solomonas near our line and Wakefield attacking, He's held by 3 Wigan players and Kirkpatrick shouts HELD, Wigan let go and Solomona drops over line and "Scores"!

Kirkpatrick goes to the video ref who can't hear Kirkpatrick shout Held so awards the try.

Basically if a ref gives a "Play on" call like that then there should be no way that a Penalty should be awarded, maybe it should just go back to the Play the Ball?

The ref did call it. That's the end of the matter.

How quick was Coley when he went through the gap! He went from his normal ambling to near supersonic in fifteen meters.

Said same! If the video had showed it was a tackle it was hardly Carmonts fault for doing what the ref told him to do!!

Very impressive! I reckon on yesterdays showing he'd give Joel Monaghan a run for his money

I have to question the integrity of the story of Coley's knee 'op' after seeing that sprint yesterday

Im sure in SOO someone was tackled but didnt know so they carried on going but the ref just told him to get back and play it instead of giving the penalty. Better rule?

Exactly!! Which mean't he had no right to ask the Video ref to judge it again..although i thought Silverwood had another great game in the middle..clearly the best ref in the sport on both sides of the world by a mile.

Thats the rule, if the ref couldn't be certain that Carmont was tackled he will shout play on. He's trying to give an advantage to the attacking side just incase what he thought he saw in a split second wasn't correct, like i said you would have been furious if you had got home and saw that Carmont wasn't tackled with a lot of space to his right and Silverwood told him to play the ball.

Its the way it is, if you have a problem then contact the RFL. I don't see how you can have a problem as he gave you the advantage and benefit of the doubt to try and score a try, remember he has a split second to make a call. Its better he plays the advantage then if Carmont was tackled on the video replay then its a pen to the defence, i'm sure Wigan would take those odds every time which is a possible pen to the opposition in their own 20 with no danger against an advantage with a strong possibilty of a 6 pointer.