We might struggle without any subs?

Mine

Richards, Roberts, Pryce, Carmont, Ainscough, Sam, Tommy, Davies, Mcilurom, Prescott, Lockers, Mossop, Tomkins

Feka, Coley, Farrell, Riddell

you'd start with mcilorum at 9? apart from that im ok with that line-up

Think id stick mathers in tbh...give him a game against an NL1 side and see if hes up to that level, just so he knows for next season whether to tout round for a contract at teams like Barrow, Leigh etc. or whether he needs to drop a further level and look for a contract with oldham or rochdale....or possibly even dewsbury celtic!!

Yes I would because although his game needs work, he adds desire and more than a little skill.

Then why have you signed so many overseas players in the last 12 months? Phelps, Roberts, Piggy etc The only way the youth will get a chanceis if Noble goes - if he stays expect another influx of Aussies for 2010

I think you've got to play him, too many clubs don't back their youngsters after a few mistakes, Ryan Hall makes them at Leeds but they stick with him.

Ainscough made 1 major error on Friday night after the game was gone. I suppose you could say it was an error that led to their clincing try but he was under extreme pressure and these things happen.

I know Saints will pepper him but these are things he's going to have to deal with if he wants to cut out a top level career at Wigan. I can't see him being dropped for the game tbh and thats the way it should be.

I doubt Pryce doing any better under the high ball even though he's about a foot taller then Ainscough.

ainscough should be played every time so yes Id play him against saints.

the lad was gutted friday night and saturday and that proves to me how much he cares about this great club! we need players like that!

so what if he makes a couple of mistakes? he will cut them out because he is young a bit of practise with radders under the high ball in training will do him wonders!