The point is not what they are called, they are facts, what is a matter of opinion is whether or not they deserve to be called such! Many a piece of human sh*te have been touched on the shoulders with a sword by the queen, but don’t expect me to call them sir. It’s a case of what is, and what’s right. Just an opinion.

opinions are like @rseholes we all have them but it doesnt make it right to shove them in peoples faces

He isn't as bad as your making him out though, certainly no worse than tomkins. I wouldn't call either of them cheats, they are both the same and just want to win, sometimes both step over the line.

Danny is actually a really decent bloke, some are too blinkered to see it. Same goes for Sam as well.

I will be attending and hope its a enjoyable game. I am quietly confident that we have the ability to win. But it will be a big challenge, as long as we play well regardless of the result, cannot ask for any more

Agreed young Sam is a great talent and a natural RL player with potential to be one of the best. He has at times over stepped the mark but havent we all.

To quote a Wigan and Leeds Great "if you aint cheating you aint trying"

Looking forward to the game, and if McD plays Ward at 6, to seeing how he copes.

Andy Greg?

Leeds are the current Sky Sports Grand Final Winners, Wigan are the real Super League Champions as where Warrington Last year

I agree (agreeing with Conroy, God my standards are slipping ), at the start of the season we all know the criteria to become 'Champions', Leeds met them last time, we hope to this year.

Barrie McDermott.

I am sure others Have said it as well though

You're finally learning my friend

Yes, the judicary panel should make the right calls all the time, but they don't.

Referees could make a mistake they make a decision from an angle with under a second to see it an make their minds on it. They do get it wrong quite often but most referees get a lot more right than wrong. When you only get 1 shot at seeing something then you can make the wrong decision thats human nature. But the panel can watch it 100's of times get reports from players, ref, touch judges etc and then evaluate it over a minimum of 24-36 hours before it goes to a disciplinary. For them to get it wrong is shocking especially on a player who had a ban this season.

The panel for me is the most corrupt and influenced part of the game. They should never get it wrong everyone can see that McGuire should have had a 2 match given that he already served a suspension and pleaded not guilty to an obvious guilty charge. His record is not that fantastic and is one of the players banned this season. That should have been used as well and he should have served 2 games. If that was Burrows or anyother player not on a ban this season fair enough but previous history must be looked at as well. They did with MM but not with others. An obvious sign for me that either they are corrupt or have no idea of whats going on.

I do agree with you, but we get back on topic again and look at all previous situations where there has been blatent disregard for many offences, Being a Leeds fan I will bring up Ablett being punched in the CC Final? not a sending off offence, but a bannable one.

McGuire would of got a two game ban, IF Wane and Tomkins kept shut. A Corrupt panel doesn't like been told what they should do. McGuire WILL get a two game ban if he appeals. The panel are not more lenient on any certain team, they just don't have a system, everything now seems to be a grade B offence, so surely the punishment should be the same for a same grade offence.. The problem is they don't have a system.

And referees do have more than 1 shot, hence having lines men and a third referee, they just don't utilize each other.