I wouldn't be at all surprised to see that as the outcome.

I don't think he will/should be banned but it was retaliation and not defence.

A warning for Stuart Fielden should be sufficient. A ban would be extremely harsh.

Keith Mason though should not play again this season. It was a blatant stamp and was very dangerous. That type of play has no part in our game.

Fielden and Griffin will be cautioned/warned

Mason will get off the stamp for 'lack of clear evidence' or something along those lines. And probably a caution for the running in

I hope I'm wrong on the Mason front

I knew we'd finally agree one day

Define blatant?

Looked like he trod on his ankle, hardly a stamp

Nonetheless, no need for it all

mason was defending his studs.

Who threw the first punch?

Can't remember if it was Fielden or not

The 10 min sin bin should be sufficient. Mason should be banned for the remaining fixtures. There is not placed in this sport for actions like that.

Mason pushed Fielden and Fielden retaliated with a few punches

I would agree with that.

Holding his leg in place and then standing on it as shown at HT by Stevo.

I think the whole incident was badly handled.

SF was defending himself. What is he supposed to do? Stand there and let himself be beaten up?

Time after time we see "both" parties being given 10 mins in incidents like this, never just the aggressor.

Terrible "unwritten rule".

i said at half time after seeing it on the replays downstairs that he would be in trouble for that, wasn't the cleverest thing to do considering he's only just come back into the team !!