Quote Kaii="Kaii"Dave you are blind when it come to H anyway, taking that this is the DaveO from that other forum. You've tried using this move to have a go at the club in general since it happened and anytime we lose or it runs close you say H would of made the difference.
So H has started for nearly 10 years has he? You sure about that'"
He averaged something like 26 games a season over his time here. I think he got half a dozen games in 2004 and was a regular fixture from 2005 on until he left except if he was injured.
His total games for us over that time were 238. Work it out for yourself.
When he has been fit I don't think he was ever been dropped throughout his time here. But regardless of that what you need to do is watch the big games he has played in for Wigan such as last years finals and then you would see his worth.
There a few quality players around in SL and we'd have been far better off in my opinion with him on board as well as Bateman and if we'd have had to pay a high wage for him to keep him, why do you care? Are experience players not worth it?
As it is our best back row is Faz, Bateman (who wasn't supposed to be playing at every opportunity according to Wane but now looks like he will need to) and Lockers. Take any one out and we are weaker.
Clubb isn't up to to it the back row and while I personally have a lot of time for Hughes in the 2nd row and think he will be a good player there one day, he is not as good as H.
It sticks out like a sore thumb we should have kept H IMO and if that cost the club a high wage, so what if he is what the club needs?
I also happen to think had a deal been done earlier in the season we probably would not have had to outbid anyone, never mind Salford as I believe he wanted to stay.