Quote Last Son of Wigan="Last Son of Wigan"Excuse me? As much you would enjoy me biting (which is obvious by the tone of your post) did you actually read what I wrote? I clearly started two reasons why I didn't rate Prescott, accept different people have different opinions. And yes for what it's worth Prescott does seem to be out a lot, and does lose the ball too much on impact.
Secondly when did I ever call Hansen a waste of space? Please fill your days looking through my past posts and you'll not find such a comment. I think you're now even fabricating reasons to start an argument.
What did I actually say about Hansen? You probably don't have a f^&king clue, and you probably don't care, you're just another keyboard warrior trying to fill his days.'"
I think you take your own advice and read what I wrote
I said if you don't rate him - fair enough
I said if you think his injury record "this Year" is enough to get rid of him - then fair enough
Isn't that me accepting that you can have an opinion?
I said if you are stating that he is "Always injured" (Your words so yes I did read what you posted) then his injury record for a FACT is not that which is perpetuated on this site by SOME posters.
As for the Hansen bit, I took it from Matty's post that you were one of the people who'd said we'd won 8 games without him so we may as well get rid as he's overated?
If you weren't I apologize (Matty, thanks for getting me in trouble).
If you were then I think you need to respond and let Matty know if your views of Hansen have changed?
I didn't want you to "Bite", I wanted your opinion on Prescott "always being injured" and if you felt that was still a fair argument based on his injury record over the last 4 years rather than the last 4 months?
If you want to get rid because of this years injury record - fair enough, I'll let other people judge that opinion and form their own opinion as I know what mine is.
If you want to get rid because he loses ball in contact too easily - Fair enough. I'll let other people judge that opinion as I will too (Wonder if we can get some error/penalty stats to back this up)
If you want to get rid because "he's always injured" (Your words not mine) and that means that he's always been injured over the last 2/3/4 years. Then fair enough - I just think that opinion is wrong and the facts wouldn't back up your argument?