It's a really bad incident that’s for sure but no worse than Yeamen’s three punches to Joel’s face.

Both Joel’s and Yeamen’s actions were intended to cause injury to another player but I’ve no doubt Joel will take 100% of the punishment.

Probably not but it's the lack of proper action which has annoyed a lot of Wigan fans.

The penalty count isn’t everything as I’d argue a few of the incidents deserved a hell of a lot more than a simple penalty giving against Hull.

lol Really, i hate Ganson as much as you but this is rugby not football. You win a very entertaining game but still moan about it. I'll not comment on the sending off or the fight until I've seen the replay's on TV. Oh and for all those who complain about Sam getting some heavy treatment need to look at what he does, like i say this is rugby and normally what goes around will come around if you upset other players with dirty tactics,

Joel will get a couple of games for that forearm, the player's head went back and everything, silly.

Probably fairly even - the problem wasn't the penalties so much as the lack of any further action for persistent foul play. Normally, after a player gets an official warning (with the captain informed), a second offence gets a yellow card. That didn't happen with Manu, even after a second warning.

The difference was the most of the penalities we conceded were for technical offences (offsides, ball steals and the like), whereas Hull were conceding them for high shots, grapple tackles, tackling a man in the air and punching.

Have to agree with the other poster - hits Yeaman in the chest, then the arms come up.

Nice cheap shot by Fitzgibbon on that tackle too - a punch to J. Tomkins kidneys.

Why did Yeaman throw 3 punches?

I'm not 100% sure here but is it the same after the ball has bounced and the player jumps. my understanding is that it should not have even been a pen.

Totally agree. Just watched it now. Sending off sufficient for me.

Exactly. It was the nature of the foul play that he let them get away with which built up the pressure and caused it to kick off.

So you still think Lima didn't do it despite pleading guilty to both charges.

Maybe you think Gleeson should have any HR meeting live on Sky Sport News because you can't stand not knowing what's going on.

1 plus point of Joel getting sent off we won , Question ?? had the Joel incident not happened would we of won ??? I don't think so, Soon s it happened the crowd got louder the hits got harder and the team woke up well slightly , I'm not saying what Joel did was right I'm just saying up until that happened i couldn't see us winning

Also all these Joel condemners would you be writing put him in u20 s, Do this, Do that had that been Farrell back in the days i don't think so,I m sure half of you on here want us have a team of soft s.

That's my view everyone has there own .

I think we would have scored on the set of six had Joel not put the shot in.

I just couldn't see it Matt today , So frustrating watching silly errors and running out of idea s ,to much 1 man rugby all the time , Carmonts be awesome in previous games and nothing was going to him or opp side apart from when we scored when we could of done that all game with our winger s

You'd imagine the Hull fans would be saying the same thing about our winning penalty. He hadn't penalised that all afternoon and then pulled a 'not clearing the ruck' penalty out of the Ganson book of maddening decisions (the same one he used to penalise them 30s earlier with). I'm not complaining mind