It does not matter how much you try and dress it up or try to cover up for Clarke, the implication of his meaning is there for all to see.

The most ridiculous thing is you can not see it, or perhaps don't want to.

Only if your gullible to believe in rugby gods in the first place !!!

Either way inferring, implying whatever. Phil Clarke has not in any way said that Danny Mcguire deserved to be injured and thats a fact. You must all be journalists with the way you twist peoples words

Oh no he didn't.

Nobody from Wigan is dressing or covering anything up. The fact is you cant see what isnt there!

Perhaps you don't want to see it, that at least i could understand.

If it was there i wouldnt have any choice but to see it, but unfortunatly for you and the Clarke bashing brigade it isnt

well come on prove it!!!!! show us where he said it .

Do you have a broken keyboard?

that would only be true if you didnt understand what the words inferring or implying meant.

Where he said what?

I am not Clarke bashing, point me to where I have said that. Clarke may even have a point that Mcguire deserves an injury for such an injustice. The fact he implies he deserves it is the point i'm trying to make. If you cannot see the implication in his statement then i'll waste no more time debating it with you because perhaps you are ignorant, or just plain stupid.