Quote Aboveusonlypie="Aboveusonlypie":2w9mai1zI wondered who this post would flush out and hey presto - down from the mountain top!'"
:2w9mai1z
I was starting to wonder if you were trolling.
Quote Aboveusonlypie="Aboveusonlypie":2w9mai1z
I wouldn't want to get into an ill-informed debate about players abilities because for one, players actually read this stuff as do their families and whilst the players probably can cope it's much more hurtful for families. I thought your comments about Andy Powell were outrageous and so unfair given he had only played 20 minutes the other night.'"
:2w9mai1z
Oh come off it. Anyone involved in pro sport knows they are under scrutiny and it goes with the territory. The idea if someone doesn't rate a player they shouldn't say so in case they may offend them or their families is ridiculous. The players get slagged off and abused far worse at matches (never from me by the way).
I also take issue with the ill-informed bit of your post as well. Many of us have watched the game for decades and can recognise both good and poor players when we see one. Not we aren't Mark Bitcon or Shaun Wane but that doesn't mean anyone posting in here is offering ill-informed opinion. They are the opinions of fans who follow the sport in detail and take a great interest in it. Or is it only ill informed if its not positive?
No idea why what you are referring to that I posted about Powell that was outrageous either.
Quote Aboveusonlypie:2w9mai1zRe lame arguments. How many years? Possibly the number of years that internet forums have existed. Before that you could air your views in the pub and only infect those around you, and if you upset anyone, you might get a smack in the mouth for your trouble.'"
:2w9mai1z
I didn't say lame arguments (plural) I was referring to the one over-used argument/come back of the coach is always right. This is a place to view our opinions not parrot his. Nothing wrong with agreeing with the coach but it's a weak position to take if that is all you can think of to justify your opinion as to why a player is good or otherwise is because the coach said so.
Quote Aboveusonlypie:2w9mai1zI suspect that secretly with your anti-Wane agenda, whilst you would like Wigan to win SL, you are also going to win if they implode, because you will be vindicated.
'"
:2w9mai1z
I suppose it was only a matter of time before you accused me of having an "agenda". What is the purpose of my so called "anti-Wane agenda" and what do I hope to achieve?
Quote Aboveusonlypie:2w9mai1zI use this site because I support Wigan, go to every game and enjoy a bit of chat about Rugby league. I am frankly amazed at the attitude of you and your acolytes, who some posters are afraid to go up against lest they be labelled a 'happy-clapper'. Your 'anti-Wane agenda' would be laughed at at any other Rugby club or even any other sporting club. To be so openly viperous about the coach and chairman when they are TOP OF THE LEAGUE - second season running is hilarious. My word, what would you have to say if you were a Saints fan!?'"
:2w9mai1z
Me any my acolytes? Who might they be and when do we meet to hatch our devious plots?
[u:2w9mai1zHope you don't take offence at this. [/u
Really!? After all that slagging off?
Anyway I am about to start my journey to the game and if Powell plays I will be cheering him on as I was last week. If he or anyone else is poor I dare say there will be a discussion about it afterwards just as there will be if anyone has a good game. That is the way it works.