Quote: thepriestman85 "The PC brigade are the political correctness idiots who run around trying to stamp out anything that may be deemed as offensive.. They guys who are ‘outraged’ at what Andy Gray said. It’s the kind of muppets who want black boards in school to be called chalk boards, the kind of people who do stuff like this;
rlhttps://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3229529/Toy-store-goes-PC-mad-with-pig-ban.htmlrl
rlhttps://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article738220.ecerl
Whilst I agree there should be a cut off point the women at the match who was ‘outraged’ by the word hole in chant at a rugby game really needs to stop being so sensitive.
ATEOTD people like the lady mentioned in this thread will find offence in anything and I can’t see why that should stop the rest for having some light hearted banter now and again.'"
Ah.
Well, I personally can't see the problem with being correct (politically or otherwise), especially if it merely means adjusting your behaviour in order to limit the risk of offending others. Is that really so bad? The two instances you single out are fascinating, admittedly.
The "Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep" song actually had its roots in a simple attempt to teach nursery level children about the different colours of the rainbow and in fact it still included (and began with) the traditional "Baa Baa Black Sheep" lyrics. Unfortunately a tabloid paper picked up on the story, got it slightly wrong (deliberately or otherwise) and made a huge song and dance about it. Before long there was an outbreak of nursery schools following this lead, presumably because the managers mistakenly thought that there was actually some sort of legislation in place that insisted the words couldn't be used. They probably felt a bit jumpy due to some of the other misleading headlines they'd seen in the Sun. Had the very media that claim to hate this sort of thing not whipped up such a frenzy about it, then the phenomenon might not have actually occurred (or at least certainly not to the same degree).
As for the toy farm, of course there are a number of countries who would not deem it acceptable to promote a childrens' farmyard toy that included a pig. For the manufacturer who wishes to sell their toy in those countries this means they can either split their production into two separate batches - piggy/no piggy, which presumably wouldn't be too difficult but probably a bit of a faff. Or they could remove the pig from all the sets.
After all, one might reason, people in Britain are surely not going to take offence at the absence of pig, are they? Its not like British people are so backward that they would actually work themselves up into a frenzy over the fact that pigs are removed from toy farms, surely!
Lets face it, the absence of pig is not something that can injure or upset anybody on religious, cultural or moral grounds. Besides, they might actually sell a few more sets in the UK to Muslim or Jewish customers.
What could possibly go wrong?
We could argue the pros and cons of such issues until we are all blue in the face, but lets not move too far from the real problem.
People were chanting swear words at a sporting event that markets itself as a
"family sport". This upsets some people. Time to stop the chant and perhaps for those who were chanting to issue an apology.
I can't see any realistic argument against this.
Regards.