You have been saying this for ages, yet there is nothing to indicate this is the case.

Quite the opposite seems to be true, what with Sam, Joel, Mossop and Thornley all returning recently.

To be honest i can think of ZERO articles (that i have read) that indicate anything but masses of respect for the Head Coach.

As for players having private debriefs by SW. What is wrong with that???

When i have performance related discussions with my staff, i generally refrain from doing it in front of the entire team. In this case JC even states that the last session he had with SW, helped him and was just what he needed!!

Why do you have to create this negative vibe about EVERYTHING?

I have got to a stage now when i do not have to bother reading your posts (which i used to enjoy) as i know it will just be completely negative. Whats the point?

Unless I completely misunderstand what you mean, no I have not.



I think you are putting real gloss on this. You think Charnley is "staff" who gets taken aside for an appraisal or a quiet word? You honestly think Wane works like that and takes note of the HR dept?



No idea.

Another DaveO whinging quote-a-thon

Who'd of thought...

Attack the ball not the man would have been my first thought....

I dont think wane would ever lose the dressing room due to the fact that hes had these players from when they were kids which makes the dressing room a very tight knit band of players

So do you honestly and sincerely believe that coaches do not (or should not) have private one-to-ones with players?

Give an honest and straightforward answer.

Could it just have been a "Josh Dom's fit again and he will be in the team on Friday i don't play Wingers of the bench so your not in the squad " kind of meeting giving a player the heads up before going public . We will never know . But hey-ho dont let that stop all the conspiracy theories they are more fun .

Regards , EW

In his column it says he was called in for a 'chat'. he is hardly likely to say who else would have been called in. I find it very hard to believe that he would be the only one hauled into the bosses office

Wane has had it in for Josh ever since Josh invited his agent over to Aus before we played the Roosters. Then the issue quickly developed. It was Josh who was dropped and blamed after that game when anyone who was watching the game could see what was happening; Goulding as flying off his line to quickly get on top of Jennings, knowing Jennings has unbelievable quick feet and speed if he gave him time he's skin Daz. However when Daz shot out of the line Jennings easily dealt with the situation often leaving Josh in no man's land.

Since this season Josh has been injured, and struggled with Joel as a centre, it's not surprising he's now dropped and will possibly end up elsewhere, which is a terrible shame, he needs to brought back into form at Wigan otherwise next year we'll have Manfredi on one wing and no recognised Wigan on the other.

It would be a shame to lose Josh and I hope he can get back to his best in Wigan colours, however IF he were to go I think he could be comfortably replaced and I expect he would free up a big slice of Cap.

Can we afford to keep a player in the team who is out of form at the expense of someone who was in form before an injury? Yes, I realise that Manfredi may come in and stink the place out and if he does he will be dropped and replaced by Charnley. However, given his good form when he has been in the team and his scoring rate, I cant see that happening

Charnley needs to get his head out of his backside (and the backside of the represent clothing people he constantly plugs on twitter) and get it back in the game

Of course it does, that's the whole point of competition for places. It's not so much "dropping players because we can" as playing the best (on form) players available at the time, and for all Sarge's faults, there's no better option at centre at present. Dropping Sarge would weaken the team; dropping Josh doesn't (IMO).