Look at him leaning towards Kearney as well. Clearly going for the head-but.....

You can't see it on the picture but he actually has a young child by the neck in his left hand.

I know you were joking, but as I say I wouldn't have been surprised with our refs. Was that the one as well where he did a little zig-zag, looked back to the Bradford player and said "Come on then" as he went over the line

How good would it have been for Sam to adopt the 'Edwards Head Nod" after that try.

Warrington have scored over 200 points than Wigan. That isn't my opinion, it is a fact.

How many at the DW? Six wasn't it. Swings and roundabouts. Wire have a better attack, I concede that Wigan are a better team than us. But our attack is on another level.

it really isn't.

If he did that the VT on here would explode

When Wigan played well against you, your attack was found to be less effective than ours. So presumably the level you're talking about is the next level down.

Be fair Cruncher... Leave him at least one straw to clutch at....

Indeed you have. Spanking the crap teams in the league and scoring against the leagues top defences however is a different matter.

The top 5 defences in the league belong to Wire, Us, Saints, Hull and Huddersfield. Points scored against those sides is as follows:

Saints - Wire 60 (av 30) Wigan 94 (av 23.5)
Hudds - Wire 56 (av 18.6) wigan 66 (av 33)
Hull - Wire 10 (av 10) wigan 44 (av 22)
Wigan - Wire 48 (av 24)
Wire - Wigan 50 (av 25)

So, as you can see. You have only managed to score (or average) more points against St Helens. We have outscored you by 10 points against Hudds despite playing 1 game less than you and having a weak team without our top scorers Sam and Richards in one of those.

So, as inside man said, you're attack is much better against Harlequins.

Talking about league? You have only scored 6 points against us..