If a spelling error is all you managed to grasp from my post then I fear I did not antagonise you nearly as much as I intended.

You post to irritate, you attack any form of criticism/debate towards your posts and now you are verbally insulting someone simply because they honor their word. You are quite ridiculous.

Ps, I still stand by saying Danny Richardson is highly over rated

Oh for gods sake how pathetic. You post 'I know something but I'm not telling you' comment and get called out on it, simple as that. What did you expect?

And big red throbber? don't be so bloody touchy it was only a joke.

PS your last line? Nice try.

No sorry, I don't post to irritate, I just don't pull any punches when dealing with people who post hypotheticals or claim 'to be in the know' then fail to actually converse with others, it's ridiculous.

I spoke to someone as close to SE as you can get without being SE himself and he says that SE has acted professionally in all this and is in the right.

I'm not going to say what he said I'm just going to keep telling everyone SE is right.

See what I did there? Could be true, could be BS and seeing as I'm not going to say anything nobody will ever know.

If I had been told something in confidence then I probably wouldn't tell everyone I'd been told something in the first place.

Exactly!! A poster who speaks sense.

No mate. You're aggressive even when your own argument has no more validity than the opposing one. You rarely fail to resort to personal insults or personal criticism and I've yet to see you admit to, let alone apologise for, being wrong.

Hiding behind the 'I pull no punches' argument only really works if you're equally hard on yourself. Otherwise it's little more than being argumentative for its own sake.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Typical Phil jumping in when he's sees a poster already being attacked.

And aggressive? I'm as calm as the day is long. That's clearly your interpretation, I could say the same about you. But as you've posted nothing about Wigan or RL in your post to me I'll assume you don't want to talk about either?

Seems more of a personal attack. How ironic.

Now now children

Yeah sorry, I got a sneaky edit in but you had already gone on the defensive. Listen this thread is regards SE/Wigan, let us leave it as that. There is zero need for me to clarify my hypothetical response to your very own hypothetical post regards Danny Richardson and his availability.

I asked for people's options on Richardson. Don't see what's hypothetical about that.

But yes I agree with returning it to a discussion of SE etc.

Do you mean I didn't mention Wigan when replying to a post that didn't mention Wigan?

I rest my case.

Phil you don't have a case. You merely saw an opportunity to jump in on me when others were already attacking me. Says a lot doesn't it.