That ban is pathetic, it's not Raynor's fault ratboy has a glass jaw.

I know, I hope he appeals!

Apparently Jon Wilkin is on his way to Red Hall now to make an official complaint about Sam headbutting Raynor's forearm.

We dont need this in our sport!

I remember Cunningham not getting a ban when he done Stosic in. If the RFL were consistent, Raynor would have got a £300 fine and it would have been universally accepted that I am soft in the head

it's no wonder then that my mate stu is too afraid to post on here if this is the treatment you get!!
edit
but to get back to it without your arguing, even though it was an awful tackle raynor has pleaded guilty to his credit and i think we should just move on

this records getting boring now! put another on.

23 pages of utter tripe!

what is the usual ban for a head tackle, initial contact with the head?

1-4 depending on severity and grade strangely this grade b was 1-2 but limas was 2-3 earlier in the year for a much less dangerous and threatening tackle.

But that is your opinion, not the RFL's. Which is based on how likely a serious injury is to occur.

Lima actually got 1 match each for two separate offences in the same game

The level of debate is seriously going downhill at the moment with the Dire and Stains bottom feeders trolling on threads. Time for a clear-out?

I've just seen the incident for the first time since the day and I think a 2 game ban is about right. I wouldn't say the hit to the head was intentional but it was reckless and players need to take abit of responsibility in those situations.

Whatever you say, chum. We will absolutely take your word for the latter assertion.