Exactly.

For every negative under Lenagans ownership theirs been plenty of positives and he's doing a fine job.

I had my doubts about him not wanting to splash out on big name players but the signing of Gleeson involving a transfer fee proved he'll pay for the right quality.

I'm happy with how things have gone since he's been here especially when you consider the mess the club was in when he took over.

The stadium fiasco was a mistake because when buying the club he failed to secure adequate rights to play at the JJB and failed to warn the supporters in advance that this kind of thing could happen.

Darrell Goulding Registered on here then is he??

Have we ever had a "what's the best thing IL has done since he got here" poll ?

I honestly think if IL went on holiday for a fortnight and found a cure for cancer on the day he came back, there'd be people on here wondering why he didn't do it before he went.

Couldn't agree more. All the other things can be rectified, the stadium issue sent a message of weakness, and we will continue to be exploited.

First of all, I'm very happy that IL is in charge of Wigan RL and I'm confident of the future of the club whilst the club is in his hands.

My only criticism was the stadium fiasco. It felt that we as a club accepted the decision by Whelan and that we were happy to go along with it. We didn't seem to publicly challenge the decision and aknowledge that Dave Whelan was out of order.

He wasn't

Yes he was!

He lied, and acted like a 3 year old throwing his dummy out of the pram.

I dont ses how IL can be blamed for the pack being weak.

We have 5 props 3 experienced ones who 2 of those are not performing over a long term basis now.

That is the coaches fault for not getting them to perform, so i suppose thats a argument for the extending nobles contract being a mistake.

With regards to the stadium 'fiasco' he hasnt fully bought the club yet, and wont be doing so for the forseable future, so i think it would be a bit rich of him telling whelan what he could and couldnt do about the pitch. Although i do think DW was being a bit awkward, but i guess you dont make that much money by being anything but.

Because it was clearly his decision not to recruit another prop. He was quoted soon after he took over as saying we had 7 props on the books (he was IIRC including a couple of junior players in that) so would not be signing another.

Since then we have not recruited another prop but have signed several backs.

I think he evidence is pretty clear.



I agree the coach should get them (and the whole team!) to perform but the fact remains 99% of posters on here have said we a need a new prop for about two years and when IL took over he said we had enough of them.

Dave

But even with only 5 props, if they all gave 100% and played like we know they can (mentioning no names) then we would be able to cope until the end of the season. As it stands we desperately need cover in that area because they are not of the standard they should be

Dave,

Are you saying 5 props isnt enough?

Granted i wouldnt have signed Robberts, as i think he is Vialeki Mk II, just stands there and doesnt really look for work or look interested, however with Gleason that may change.

I wouldnt have signed riddell either, as while higham isnt great, we didnt really need a 9 as much as we needed a 6.

That for me is the biggest let down, we new barrett was leaving and did nothing about it!

The 5 props we have are as good on paper as any other front 5, i do realise that the game is played on grass not paper, but again i dont see how this is IL's fault that fielden is poop and Coley has only started playing come contract time!