It'd probably make sense to use him as an impact sub to be honest, but given the money they've spent and the hoohaa his signing has generated, I can't see them doing that.

He could redefine the job of a number 8. Don't waste energy in rucks and mauls but operate out in the centre channels when attacking, and defend on the inside of the stand off to smash the runners that come round the corner. As an extra back he won't be relied on for long passes and kicking, the 10, 12 and 15 can do that. With somebody like Brown following him then his offloads could work well. When it comes to big hits in defence I don't think they will be as effective as they are in League. Not on forwards anyway. The running style close to the ruck tends to be stooped over leading with the head and shoulders and prepared to go to ground in the best position to recycle the ball. Also some of the front five will be a lot heavier than league forwards and simple physics will negate some of the effects of the big hit. FYI I have played both and enjoy watching both. But would chose League to play or watch every time.

The publicity RU has produced from the acquisition of Sam Burgess has proved once again the saying “if you polish a turd it’s still a turd” is utter b*llocks!! and does not apply to RU. The brainwashed sheep who were indoctrinated from birth, and upper-class twits who run the game and the country will IMO always have the upper hand over our sport when it comes to the media, no matter how much we rant and rage about the injustice. They know what works in life, power and money. You can see it for yourself in the only successful attack on their power that the working classes ever had “football” Look what’s happening to that now at the top flight! The working classes are slowly being priced off the terraces.

So that means that more than half the top performers went to a Comp - although the exact numbers do depend on who you ask (lies, damned lies & statistics etc)
rlhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/9449422/An-Olympic-education-schools-producing-Team-GB-Olympians.htmlrl

I'll also lump the club in missing the point too after this afternoon's announcement that we're playing Skolars again next year [iON A FRIDAY AT 2PM[/i WTF ?!
I'd actually like to go to this, but why a Friday? I've a job to do 200 miles north. Can't exactly take an extended lunch to trot down there (even if I wangled a meeting in the London office). It's also a school day, I thought RL in London was trying to get the kids involved?

Talk about a blown opportunity.

Point being, that a much smaller percentage of the population go to Public School...

Yep. Exactly the same last year.

The same as last year yes, but as a day out to have a look at some of the younglings I'd actually like to have an option if you please. No problem trying to attract the corporates (also probably why Farrell is the guest speaker at the dinner - to appeal to the rah-rahs), but are there any figures from last year's event to back up the efficacy of this approach? Given that it's been going on between Broncos & Skolars for some years, has anything actually come from this "networking" attempt (sorry - hate that term).

It's actually more an indictment of the state of sport in Comps. The Bitch Thatcher started the wholesale sell-off of school land & her lick-spittle, Major carried it on with Blair & Brown not doing anything to reverse the problem.
The only places left that can conceivably grow our future elite athletes [iare [/ithe fee-paying schools, so it's no surprise (nor a problem, IMO) that a disproportionate number come from that direction.
Until we stop leaning so far towards academic subjects in curricula & cater for those people who are never going to remember Pythagoras' theorem let alone revel in Dickens or Maxine Peake as Hamlet (she was fab, by the way), then the demise of sport in state schools will continue until it crosses the point of no return. If it hasn't already.

I'm sure there'll be other opportunities for you.