What part of the enormous city of London did you visit to declare it such a hole out of interest?

Its the part that starts off at the Watford gap and finishes at Ramsgate, anywhere in between i think he means. Hope that narrows it down enough for you.

Northern boy is alive and well .

No chips on shoulders in Wigan then! Bless.

London is not an enormous city. In fact it is a very small city (1.2 square miles, 7,000 population). The London of 8,000,000 people is a county.
Yes I know it is confusing with both being called London but that is how it is.

Thankfully not everyone is as blinkered as you.

Both are great City's my northern bias ensures I lean towards Manchester however I do enjoy my trips to the capital for business and pleasure

wow an oddly titled thread taken over by a Warrington fan trolling saints fans on a wigan board. On the original topic bookies pick favorites and they are currently picking Wigan and rightfully so, this wont change unless there is a training ground injury meltdown or similar that takes out all of wigan's key players.

To the prat who said this Saints side are the worst side to finish top , what does that say about the rest ? Also worth mentioning the current team is missing alot of the players who started the season so well thus laying the platform to finish top.

Oh and I've got to say I agree with whoever said London is a dump. I hate the place

No way will Wigan score 44 points next week, if you're being sarcastic then I'm struggling to detect but I think your team deserve a lot more credit.

The odds on a Wigan win may reduce dramatically if Micky Mac is ruled out of the final through injury. Hope not but it didn't look good last night and doesn't sound good today.

Trolling?

Hard truth is hardly trolling

mm will play with one eye or anything else.wane as already said we will fix mm up AFTER the grand final.

Couple of my Wigan mates in Swinley were saying he has a fractured eye socket with some blood bleed at the back of the eye. Brave lad if he plays and gets further damage.

I'm convinced if he doesn't play he won't have made that decision. He will basically have been banned from playing by the medical team and if they think its serious enough to stop him then fair enough.

All this false humility kids nobody, “everyone knows we’ve no chance” “how can we win with so many key players injured” “Wigan will win by forty” give me a break, it’s the GF anything could happen. How many would have given the Cats a realistic chance against Leeds with a follow up with Huddersfield, so it won’t wash. Anyone who takes the result for granted is either a fool or a liar. PS as for London the only dicky bird I can say about it is that it’s tom tit.

It's never a foregone conclusion. On paper we should've beaten Warrington more easily than we did. St. Helens don't have their best players but they have been without the likes of Lomax, Walsh and Wilkin for a large chunk of the season. They won't have to adapt to the way they approach Wigan like they might have had to should injuries have only just hit them.

Wigan's discipline and ball-handling skills out wide when we get an overlap will have to be improved upon. If we play like we did against Huddersfield it will be difficult for St. Helens to live with us IMO. If we are not that clinical then who knows, that's the beauty of sport.