Yes as you say there’s always hope or, where there’s a WILL there’s a way, or a dead body!

I'd have Sinfield in the squad above Chase

Purely on the act that he's English

Well.....that and being a better all round player

McNamara walked out of the press conference today because journalists were questioning why Graham wasn't picked in the squad, how dare they question why one of our best players have been picked! The coaching set up is an absolute mess I despise the fact that he is in charge, we have such a good opportunity here with the World Cup in our own back yards and the best squad we have had in years yet I have absolutely no optimism because of the man in charge.

This is an headline in a tomorrow Sydney newspaper.

Scandalous England ready to implode ahead of World Cup Opener

Read morehttp://www.foxsports.com.au/league/scandalous-england-ready-to-implode-ahead-of-world-cup-opener/story-e6frf3ou-1226747103812#ixzz2ikpbuBbJrl

Found out today that Ben Westwood lost his mum on Monday. Whether he plays or not i guess will depend on his own personal frame of mind, some use such personal grief to have the game of their lives, others like to be with family. Thoughts with him and his family on such a sad loss. He will be a massive miss if he doesnt play but again such a loss puts the importance of things in perspective.

Once more McNamara has failed the litmus test of the top job, if as the boss you make a decision that you think is right (and I think he was) you must then be able to justify that decision to anyone. His walking out, because that’s what it was has just aggravated the situation and for me just demonstrates the lack of balls in himself that he would not accept in others.

Headline in Monday's Sydney paper:

"Aussies throw match to save World Cup"

Taken from the above
Wigan's talented hooker Micael McIlorum was also controversially omitted and the Australians won't mind that either given Tim Sheens rates McIlorum highly

I do not think there was ever any chance of McNamara going with Roby and MM in the team, if he did it would mean he would he would have to spell either Chase or Sinfield if he wanted to bring Burrows on.
I think his intention is for Roby to be spelled with Burrows going to halfback and Sinfield to Hooker, in the S/L there does not seem much difference in hooker and scrumhalf anyway.

Edit.
Egg on face. Change Burrows for Widdop.

A few words of caution to England fans who dont watch NRL:
The Burgess bros do lose the ball a lot: mainly because their game is based on dominating in the collision and they like to get up and play the ball asap. This encourages the "cheats" to leave a hand or knee in the tackle- even though the rules clearly state the tackler must back off and not interfer.
Also, Slater and Cronk have a trick where on the last tackle Cronk will release a bomb and Slater will not track the ball directly but runs straight to the fullback and "reads" the FB. When the FB leaps for the catch Slater also leaps and spins and somehow wins the ball, effectively he uses the FB's actions to win the ball - its genius. Expect these tricks happen.

Get Westwood off he is a friggin liability!!

After watching today Id personally make the following changes. Assuming Lockers is fit, him to 13 and S Burgess to second row along side Ferres who I was impressed with. Westwood out and Farrell taking his spot on the interchange. Mossop out, and Graham in. Mossop was by far the poorest performing prop of the Burgess boys and Hill. Sinfield will always make the squad and if Mcnamara chooses to play him at 7 then Widdop needs to start at 6. Not move a player who should is a loose forward, who has played 6 all season to scrum half and interchange him to 9. Bin Chase and have Mcilorum either to start or off the bench to spell the rook.