Gutted Leeds have beaten Warrington in the Grand Final though, utterly disillusioned with the state of Rugby League at the minute. It's not so much about me as a Wigan fan being jealous of Leeds, I would have loved to have seen Warrington win it, a nice change to the same boring Leeds 'success story' every season. What's the point in the regular rounds now? What's the point at all now? Maybe we will feel different in a few month after being RL-free for a while.

Can't believe any Wigan fan would want Wire to win the league

If Leeds had finished top every time they had won the GF I would say fair play - but they are consistently average. Champions should be consistently brilliant. And that mean doing it from the first game to the last. They have won 5 from 6 but how many times have they finished top. Once. So really they have been the best team once. Not that great. and the fact that they are always underdogs means the pressure isn't on them. How many GF's have they actually gone into as favourites?

How strange. This is how we fans of other clubs felt during the late 80's and early 90's when Wigan dominated as no other club could afford to challenge them.

lets go through the motions until about June, then start to peak........finish 5th, even if it means blowing a few games (rhinos v wakey)...then finish the season with a bang.
easy game v 8th........away game v a team coming off a loss, ...away game v team out of sorts after a week off.........then 80 minutes effort..........result

Count again numpty!

Count again numpty!

PS You don't have to finish first. If you had been advocating the top team should be "Champions" in 2004 when we got 50 points from 28 games before having to 'play-off' against Bradford you'd have some credibility. You have none. If the RL had any balls you'd have been relegated so give it a rest,eh?

CHAMPIONES!

This

We certainly need to look at our plan for next year when it comes to trying to win the league. It's always been a case with the play offs that the teams that build momentum at the right time tend to win them but nothing like now. Leeds are literally turning up for 4 or 5 games a year and are quite clearly not the 5th best team in the country.

I hope next year we just aim for 3rd-6th position and don't put too much emphasis on finishing first. I'd rest Tomkins, Richards, Lockers etc every few weeks on a rotational basis and really get some of the young lads pushed through. We should basically treat it as 27 trial games to help us keep the lads fresh for the important games and to help us expand our squad by giving the juniors their chance.

As an example of how I'd plan if we say draw Batley in the challenge cup and have say Bradford the week before in the league, I'd rest 7 or 8 for the Bradford game and ensure they're fit for the important cup match against Batley. It may only be a 0.1% chance of defeat against Batley but lose that and you've lost half your season. Lose against Bradford and it matters very very little in the grand scheme of things.

Forgive me then but you are an idiot.

You need to look again at the fundamentals and what are the main objectives of attaining the top level of success in the available competitions at the start of the season. (not moaning at the end of the season)

In anyones book the 3 trophies in relative order are

1. Championship Play Offs GF
2. CC Final
3. League Leaders Trophy

To set out at the start to achieve the 3rd is OK if thats what you want but in order to achieve the ultimate goal requires a stategic plan which involves rationing and preserving resources over the full season.

Leeds played a total of 36 games this season and IIRC correctly thats more than any other SL club and I would say that they won a significantly more than 50% of those games.

To take the league game wins in isolation and argue that we are then only average on that basis is a reflection on the current Wigan thinking on the definition of success.

Alot of your fans would have alot more credibility if you had been spouting this a few season ago, when it was you who finished lower down and were getting to eliminators with the chance of glory.

Back then it was ''what a great achievment it would be for this wonderful wigan club, the greatest in all of history, if they could add another chapter to their thick book of success and win the grand final from (insert 4th 5th 6th) place''

When leeds set a record in 2004 and finished on 50 points were you depserate for wigan to lose the eliminator that year as leeds had clearly been better over the season?

Just had a check

we played a total of THIRTY NINE games and WON THIRTY.

Hardly average

apologies you are correct BUt its still a much better average than 50%

almost 70% success in all competitions.

I agree rugby league seems to be going to hell in a handcart. I can’t see that Leeds winning the GF is worthy of praise when it just reinforces the strategy of not playing to your best for most of the season and seemingly saving it all for CC, and mainly the play offs and GF. It works so why am I complaining? Because things are bad enough and I don’t what any more teams following their example. I’m not alone in thinking the regular rounds are becoming redundant, just a means of getting a place in the play offs, it seems that fifth is about right. Some are saying that they won’t be renewing their season tickets, and I can see why. What to do? For a start, change the play off structure, bring back promotion and relegation, and call the side that finishes top the champions.