FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Salary Cap
38 posts in 4 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Bilko , Pemps
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1735No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2023Oct 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: WARRIORCRAIG "I agree this. Nobody wants to see the cap increase to get to a situation where one or two clubs are dominating with nobody else being able to compete. But stipulations could be added to allow teams to keep their best homegrown players by matching the salaries being offered even if this means it takes them over the limits of the salary cap (if they could afford to.)'"


An idea maybe is for a marquee signning not to count on the cap. You can pay 1 player in your team whatever you can afford . That does not count on the cap. That would gurantee that you keep Sam at Wigan for a few years and allows more money to go to the rest of the sqaud. So you could pay others tempted to go to union a bit more in the hope you persuade them to stay.

Also it will not become a free for all and leave anyside disadvantaged on the cap.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2797No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2017Oct 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
39978_1327618193.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_39978.jpg



Quote: tank123 "An idea maybe is for a marquee signning not to count on the cap. You can pay 1 player in your team whatever you can afford . That does not count on the cap. That would gurantee that you keep Sam at Wigan for a few years and allows more money to go to the rest of the sqaud. So you could pay others tempted to go to union a bit more in the hope you persuade them to stay.

Also it will not become a free for all and leave anyside disadvantaged on the cap.'"


I'd say it should be for a player(s) who have come through the youth system rather than a "marquee" player. Look at the Storm in Oz where they had players like Cronk, Slater, Smith, Inglis and Folau all come through their youth system and then they broke the salary cap when they tried to pay them what they were worth. Then the sport as a whole ended up losing Folau to ARL.

In my opinion if your youth system has managed to produce so many players that become stars at the top level then you should be allowed to keep them. Developing players from the age of 13/14 in to international players costs alot of time and money, and at the minute the clubs just have to sit back and watch as other clubs/sports come in and poach these players because their hands are tied when it comes to paying them.

If nothing is done then this will soon happen again with Charnley, Sam, Farrell, Mossop, Lomax, Gaskell, Briscoe, Hall etc etc, especially now that England RU will be looking for quick fixes after the recent world cup.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach16257
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Jul 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
10289_1326111229.png
Challenge Cup winners 2009 2010 2012 2019 League Leaders 2011 2016:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10289.png



Quote: WARRIORCRAIG "I'd say it should be for a player(s) who have come through the youth system rather than a "marquee" player. Look at the Storm in Oz where they had players like Cronk, Slater, Smith, Inglis and Folau all come through their youth system and then they broke the salary cap when they tried to pay them what they were worth. Then the sport as a whole ended up losing Folau to ARL. '"


Well it is a bit loose to say they came through Melbourne's youth system. Melbourne was their first professional club but those guys are all Queenslanders that came through the Queensland Cup competition and were signed as professionals by Melbourne. But there is a valid point on the Melbourne Storm situation - those were all outstanding players and how come clubs like Brisbane, N Q Cowboys etc did not pick them up as juniors? The Storm's scouting network must have gone looking in Queensland for undiscovered talent and given it a shot in the NRL and they should be rewarded for it. Matt King was also on the outer as well working as a binman because he wasn't on the books of a professional club, and they found him....so the Storm were superb at unearthing talent...

RankPostsTeam
International Star146No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 201113 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2023Oct 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
62359_1690379119.jpg
Wigan Rugby Club, Best in all the Land [color=#FF0000:3czsb61p]Marching On to Wembley and Singing with the Band[/color:3czsb61p] At Home We Are Unbeatable, Away We are Supreme [color=#FF0000:3czsb61p]So Give Us a Cheer, The Lads are Here[/color:3czsb61p] The Wigan Rugby Team!!:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_62359.jpg



What about exemption from the cap for young players considered to be International or future international (England Knights) standard. Could be a solution to keep RU away from the best young talent. They don't throw money at developing or good/average (but useful) players, they come in for the young lads destined for glory.

So make a statement by saying, if you can be good enough to get into the international set-up then you can get that nice big wage packet you are contemplating elsewhere?

EDIT: I see this is already kind of been suggested, I should have read past page two...

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach13936
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Jun 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
30366_1604259384.jpg
[color=#000000:3fno8grb]Rugby Union: When entertainment just isn't your thing. [/color:3fno8grb]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_30366.jpg



Quote: Pie Eyed "Why do we need 14?

Why should our sport at the top level be limited by those no-marks, with neither ambition nor foresight at the bottom?

For too long we have allowed the Wakefields and Castlefords of this world dictate what the best teams are allowed to do....

"If the cap is raised, we won't be able to afford it, therefore we're not going to allow you to do it".

Then as soon as Cas are relegated, they start bleating that they should be allowed to spend MORE than the Championship cap, simply because they CAN afford to and "why should we be held back"?

Well guess what - The best of us are being held back by YOU shower of sh|te, and our chairmen are allowing it to happen.

We need a change in the system to reflect what a club can TRULY spend.

If we had something like the UEFA Fair-Play rules, whereby a club had to show either a minimum profit or at least a break-even over say 3 years, that would no longer penalise those of us that have actually marketed our clubs.

It would also penalise clubs with no ambition, no clue and no money.

Tough luck. Work harder.

What is the point in us consistantly improving our attendance figures (other than to show that we can) if we can't spend the increased revenue that it generates?

Please, for the sake of our sport - Stop the tail from wagging the f***ing dog !!!!!

Remove the right of the little clubs to prevent the top ones from moving forward (safely).

If something makes sense and could save/improve our sport - Get it implemented.'"


Amen to that! a014.gif

This fella has hit the nail on the head completely.

Too many teams in Super League. Not enough money. Not enough talent. Result? Mediocre competition (the same four teams have won the SL) and clubs going bust (Crusaders). Where is talent going to come from if our elite players are being poached from the NRL/Union? And how are we going to produce enough talent to fill those voids left not only by players cherry picked by other rival competitions, but also for the NRL players we can no longer afford? A market Ian Lenagan has described as 'largely dead'. It's not sustainable.

Cut the Super League by two teams. We'd have more money to spread across the clubs and more talent. 14 teams is FAR too many for RL, at the moment. Rugby Union only has 12 teams. We have an increased TV deal and record profits made at the RFL that could be better spread across fewer teams. Say to clubs for the next round of franchises that we're selecting the elite 12 teams in RL from either competition - the rest play in the Championship. Re-introduce promotion/relegation and let's build from there.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach20628
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2016Aug 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
44480_1390845286.jpg
It's been fun.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_44480.jpg



Restructure, currently top three leagues have a combined number of 35 team

SL- 10 teams

Off this years standings
1.Wire
2.Wigan
3.Saints
4.Hudds
5.Leeds
6.Catalans
7.Hull FC
8.Hull KR
9.Castleford
10.Bradford

Next we have championship 12 sides

1.Salford
2.Quins
3.Wakefield
4.Crusaders(for this discussion forgetting their situation)
6. Featherstone
7. Leigh
8. Batley
9. Sheffield
10. Widnes
11. Halifax
12. Hunslet

But we have a kind of P&R

Next division down has 14 teams.

SL has a top 5 playoff for the GF
6th place stays in the league

7th, 8th, 9th and 10th go in to a relegation playoff 7v10 8v9 winners stay up both losers go in to a game loser goes in to a P&R one off game

Championship have a top 6 playoff winner of that system go in to a P&R game.

If the team isn't good enough to beat the loser of SL then they are not ready but at least they have a chance of going up.

10 team SL means the talent is condensed hopefully creating a better game and creating more interest, then bring in a system in which you have a salary cap as such but it's based on what you earn, so Wigan having the most fans would be able to spend X amount of pounds but are capped on % on income, so if you want to spend more you have to come up with ways of earning more ie marketing, improving facilities, hiring stadium out etc.

You are still capped to some extent but teams like Wigan and Leeds would be able to spend more than Hudds and if Hudds want to spend more then try to make more.

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member9565No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2019Dec 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif
:fonds noir/Buzz Lightyear.gif



I don't have a problem with the top clubs being able to spend within their means - i.e. a solvency-based salary cap. I also don't have a problem with excluding 3rd party payments to players from the cap. Why shouldn't Sam Tomkins be able to earn a lot extra from advertisers if it helps keep him?

The reality is we're a 4/5 team competition anyway. Keep the rest solvent by all means, but most don't spend anywhere near the cap anyway so it hardly matters what the actual cap level is (some spend 30-40% at best).

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2513No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2016Jan 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
50582_1268771718.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50582.jpg



Quote: Horatio Yed "Restructure, currently top three leagues have a combined number of 35 team

SL- 10 teams

Off this years standings
1.Wire
2.Wigan
3.Saints
4.Hudds
5.Leeds
6.Catalans
7.Hull FC
8.Hull KR
9.Castleford
10.Bradford

Next we have championship 12 sides

1.Salford
2.Quins
3.Wakefield
4.Crusaders(for this discussion forgetting their situation)
6. Featherstone
7. Leigh
8. Batley
9. Sheffield
10. Widnes
11. Halifax
12. Hunslet

But we have a kind of P&R

Next division down has 14 teams.

SL has a top 5 playoff for the GF
6th place stays in the league

7th, 8th, 9th and 10th go in to a relegation playoff 7v10 8v9 winners stay up both losers go in to a game loser goes in to a P&R one off game

Championship have a top 6 playoff winner of that system go in to a P&R game.

If the team isn't good enough to beat the loser of SL then they are not ready but at least they have a chance of going up.

10 team SL means the talent is condensed hopefully creating a better game and creating more interest, then bring in a system in which you have a salary cap as such but it's based on what you earn, so Wigan having the most fans would be able to spend X amount of pounds but are capped on % on income, so if you want to spend more you have to come up with ways of earning more ie marketing, improving facilities, hiring stadium out etc.

You are still capped to some extent but teams like Wigan and Leeds would be able to spend more than Hudds and if Hudds want to spend more then try to make more.'"


That would improve the domestic product imo. The playoff systems you mentioned would need a little working out but im sure it can be done. P&L needs to return in some form for me, the teams at the bottom are just hanging around doing jack so other teams should be allowed to have a crack.

38 posts in 4 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Bilko , Pemps
38 posts in 4 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Bilko , Pemps



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


5.154296875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
Recent
Shareholders Meeting
Scarlet Pimp
4
Recent
Bulls Accounts up to Nov 2023
Blotto
3
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
25s
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40077
58s
Squads - Leopards v Robins
Cokey
14
1m
Squad 2024
Greg Florimo
708
2m
Playoff Semi Final
NickyKiss
2
2m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
62437
2m
Round 26 Wigan Away
Once were Lo
134
2m
Film game
karetaker
3668
3m
This weeks disciplinary
karetaker
1330
3m
Todays game v Giants
Barbed Wire
52
3m
Shareholders Meeting
Scarlet Pimp
4
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Playoff Semi Final
NickyKiss
2
TODAY
Bulls Accounts up to Nov 2023
Blotto
3
TODAY
Shareholders Meeting
Scarlet Pimp
4
TODAY
James Clark
Jake the Peg
6
TODAY
Le Cats at home - Los Alomos Custers Last Stand
Hasbag
15
TODAY
Realistic targets for 2025
CarlB
25
TODAY
2024 Southstandercom Prediction Competition Week 27
Rixy
2
TODAY
Club Statement
UllFC
49
TODAY
Wakefield Trinity Sweep Aside York Knights Challenge
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Old FC when we knew how to play rugby
mk_fc
5
TODAY
WIRE YED Prediction Competition London Home
Wire Weaver
2
TODAY
Dons v Widnes - Sunday 15 September 2024
Kick and cha
6
TODAY
Catalans Keep Season Alive With Victory Over The Broncos
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
A new low
Jo Jumbuck
3
TODAY
Salford Ensure Play-Offs And Send Hull FC Bottom
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Points difference
orangeman
15
TODAY
Toulouse away
faxcar
19
TODAY
Todays game v Giants
Barbed Wire
52
TODAY
Staying or Not
fanstanningl
19
TODAY
Salford H Moved to Thursday
NickyKiss
26
TODAY
North Stand
NickyKiss
22
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Wakefield Trinity Sweep Aside ..
543
Catalans Keep Season Alive Wit..
343
Salford Ensure Play-Offs And S..
333
Ruthless Wigan Thrash the Rhin..
430
Huddersfield Giants Hold Off L..
870
Salford Close In On The Play O..
846
Leigh Leopards Up To Fourth Af..
982
Leeds Rhinos Into the Six Afte..
939
Wigan Warriors Defeat Hull KR ..
983
Wane Names Provisional Squad f..
1207
Leeds Rhinos Ride Their Luck F..
1290
Wigan Warriors Level Top As Ca..
1390
Castleford Tigers Inflict Anot..
1334
Leigh Into the Six After Beati..
1570
Five Into Three - Our Top Six ..
2157