Well i was just going from thishttp://www.wiganwarriors.com/WContent.aspx?id

FB 2 Roberts
RW 24 Goulding
RC 3 Gleeson
LC 4 Carmont
LW 5 Richards
SO 6 Sam
SH 7 Leuluai
P 8 Fielden
H 9 Riddell
P 29 Tuson
SR 11 Hansen
SR 12 Joel
LF 13 O'Loughlin

S 10 Coley
S 15 McIllorum
S 17 Paleaaesina
S 25 Farrell

Lots of firepower off the bench to make sure we don't fizzle out after 20 again, don't want Pat at FB because he's so important on the wing but if Roberts starts looking pap then switch them midway

I'd play it safe and play him at FB from kick off.

As effective a winger he is, we should have enough about us to be threatening enough with him at FB.

I'd go with ...

Roberts
Goulding
Gleeson
Carmont
Pat
Sam
Tommy
Coley
McLlorum
Fielden
Farrell
Joel
Lockers

BENCH...

Riddell
Feka
Prescott
Hansen

Let McLlorum start, we always start like a house on fire. Then when our front line props come off for Feka and Prescott bring Riddell and Hansen on at the same time to add the impact and keep us on a role.

Amos isnt playing on friday

the team IS

Sam
Pat
Gleeson
Carmont
Goulding
Lockers
Tommy
Stu
Pig
Coles
H
Faz
Joel

Feka
Precky
Mickey
Tuson

Well I would suggest a different 19 for a start.

If you honestly think that putting Lockers at 6 is a valid option then we may as well stop this debate now.

The bench should include a player able to cover in the backs at the very least.

Phelps would seem an obvious option. TL could rotate to hooker maybe dropping McIllorum. Maybe put Charnley there, I dunno.

Then again I am not paid to make those decisions.

What I will say is that from 14-0 up on Friday ONE injury to our halfback ensured we lost the game. Imo the risk of this happening again > the "luxury" of having a back on the bench.

If you are right then MM is an idiot. I really really hope that you are wrong.

If Locky is playing 6 we can forget any chance of getting to the GF, never mind winning it.

its not often i question maguires judgement but SOL at 6? why?

in madge we trust...?

+1

we had no hope with him at 6 on Sunday, so why oh why has he put him back there? surely the logical side is to put Sam back where he belongs and bring someone in who has a decent tackling game, cos no disrepect to Sam, hes not the best at last gasp tackling for me

Not if thats the team, because there are several better options and if Roberts really wont play, why not give Phelps a run, or recall Pryce, all better options that Locky @ 6.

I feel dirty saying this but I'm slowly losing confidence in MM. I felt with Noble we had plan A, and if Plan A didnt work we tried plan A....now the only difference I see between the two is MM's plan A looks a lot fancier and involves players being fitter. I hope im wrong because for a long time MM could do no wrong in my eyes but hes slowly losing his invulnerability from critism, then again...we may stick 50+ past KR and I'll eat my words, doubt it though.

I really hope Lockers isn't at #6!

It would be a Milward/Noble esq error on MM part as there are plenty of other options.

Sam Tomkins is the best #6 in SL, Phlps has experience there and has been playing well in that position for the reserves. Both of those should be playing at 6 before Lockers.