Hetherington talks nonsense.
He says the administrators should change rules from being so negative.
He is the administrator in charge!
Hetherington is Chief Exec of Super League so why is he talking about others when he's referring to himself and his counterpart Super League Chairmen?
It's the SL chairmen who bring in all the negative rules so why doesn't he and they do something about it instead of suggesting it's someone else's fault.

He was also suggesting that the Leeds/Wigan game was down to one try because of negative tactics. Did he not notice it was pouring down with rain all game which affected the ball handling of both sides?

I have never really paid attention to any bias from any commentators until the last week. I was slightly skeptical and thought to be honest that most were probably just a bit paranoid. However last weekend I made sure I listened more to Kears reading into the game and was outraged by nearly everything he said. It was a shocking display and I have lost alot of respect for him. Last night on boots n all Eddie didn't bother me too much until the closing statement, you could hear the bitterness in his voice. I had to rewind it to make sure i'd heard it right.

Cheers mate.

Kears as a match comentator is a joke if we are playing. Bitter little man. Like you i have always thought wiggy a joke, but his closing comment was said in a very unpleasant way. If other presenters on SKY are seen by others as biased in our favour, its just for balance. We can hardly be blamed for who SKY decide to employ. Perhaps SKY should employ the eloquent Jamie Peacock at some future date. But i do seem to forget that we run the RFL, SKY, and are responsible for the credit crunch all to help us cheat at every possible opportunity. I do hope Seniors foot is ok after that vicious atack.

Oh the sheer ignorance of the man beggars belief. He actually is a first hand tool. Get him moved on ASAP. RL needs a strong Wigan.

Gary Hetherington said that is was Wigan on saturday that employed a 'wrestling' technique in the ruck, did he not see his own side doing the exact same? I've been told the penalty count was even, and with the score being so close, how can he say it was just us employing this tactic?

Fair play to Terry O'Connor trying to defend us, but he was fighting a losing battle. Like Terry said, we have one of the best defences, but we also have one of the best attacks, so what is this negative rugby that everyone says we are playing?

Wigan Warriors - Rugby Leagues Number One Enemy

Imagine if we actually win something, sky will be ram fooking jammed every week with people complaining Thats incentive enough for me

Paranoid much?

You do realise that the way a team operates in defence and the way a team operates in attack are two different things don't you?

There are two of them with burgundy hair - Eddie and Phil Clarke - think they share a bottle of Grecian 2000 if truth be known.

Phil Clarke usually shows more bias towards Saints than us but he should have a special place in his heart for us anyway seeing as he is both a Wiganer and an ex team member

How can Clarke be so biased when he praises Saints so much. If I remember rightly I've heard him refer to them as the mighty Saints on a few occasions, you will never hear a Wigan fan let alone a biased one say that. He has a much more intelligent view on the game than any of the others in my opinion.

Save some of your outrage for next week's Boots n All thread guys! Personally, I prevent that buffoon Hemmings from upsetting me by [inot watching the programme[/i.

How can you keep up with what tint his hair is this week if you don't watch!

I'm sure the point he's making is that Wigan are being held up as an example of a negative team whilst the counter argument is that our attack is the 2nd best in the league, something that in no way can be deemed negative. Not a difficult argument to make or grasp. I don't know what point you're trying to make? You stated something obvious but for what reason?