If its just a transfer fee, 12 months before they can get him for nothing, they are mad. If its part transfer , part wages then maybe, but its still a huge gamble.

I really think that you lot are over hyping Tomkins. He is far from the great player that you are making out. He does have potential but is far from the finished article as is Eastmond. Both their displays hardly set the world alight at the weekend did they.
Tomkins for me also has a suspect attitude in respect that he can easily be got at.
Apart from the forward pass that he collected at the weekend he hardly struck fear in to the opposition..
Myler is probably on a par with both of them and has played in a poor Salford team all year.

There have been alot of games this year other fans will not of seen where he has been superb, you watch him collect the young player of the year award even if he does not play the next few games. He has more of an all round game than Myler and Eastmond. All the best players have an attitude. Good players are always hated by other fans like Long or Wellens (a former good player) from saints

Tony Smith wasn't the Wire coach then you plonker.

I'm not sure that's altogether comparable, to be honest. For one thing, I'm not sure Wire are offering to double whatever Salford have offered, and the lure of potential success has to be worth something.

Well played Salford is all I can say.

200k of that is IL's money which went their way for Gleeson.

100?

200k in what currency? it was £100k

Unless he thinks Mathers is worth 100k

Your right, NEIL BARKER at the time said wigan payed Warrington 200k and gave wire mathers for Gleeson......SO IT MUST BE TRUE.