or do what he did against leeds where 4 times prior to sending scruton off he had put players on report for a spear tackle in the 08 season with not so much as a sinbining in sight but couldnt get his red card out quick enough at hq.

scrutons tackle was dangerous, the other tackles were no way has bad as that.

That's because Scruton's was a shocking tackle that deserved a red.

now i never said it wasnt a red imo and i hadnt seen the others but all i think we want from refs is consistancy and i feel its massivley lacking in gansons reffing!!

all i really said was 4 times previous he did the same thing and let the panel judge how bad the said tackles were. but reffing a club he is a life long fan of against there biggest rivals he changed protocol.

when what i feel he should have done is what he had done consistantly before.

Your making yourself look rather silly.

now mr chips did you really see all the others and if so where and can you tell me where i can view them. as i would like to see how different the others were that made it so clear cut for ganson to give scruton a straight red.

now now saint macca!! all i have said is that what we want is for refs to be consistant or is that silly?? ive said that imo it was a red, i thought scrutons ban was a little light too. all i did was point out said refs change of protocol.

its not like ganson pans saints is it?? even though he did look rather foolish after the cup final!

and let me tell ya sun shine as far as looking silly goes, in my life posting an opinion in rl forum doesnt even scratch the surface!!

Alright pal calm down. Jesus wept don't make yourself look like a tit etc the majority of whinos fans.

You can't compare every tackle, they're all different and you have to deal with each one on its own merits (or otherwise). Like you say you didn't see the others so why you've got the hump I don't know?

my point is about some fans thinking ganson will be harsh with saints as he's a fan! i dont think this to be true.

i just used the scruton situation as an example of how he had been doing something consistantly and then changed tack.

i agree with you you should call the tackles how you see them but previously he had just been sticking em on report! i have no doubt they were alll different just by the nature of the game.

i dont really have the hump at all, just dont expect ganson to be consistant. when it was mentioned by someone in the tread you might get a bit more from ganson because he's refing saints i didnt and dont agree. the scruton situation is one i thought long and hard over. why did ganson get a set of balls at hq when previously they had been left at home with his red card

Well seeing as you've already admitted you didn't see any of the others, AND you agreed Scruton deserved a red I'm struggling to see any point you have. Add in the fact you've already agreed every tackle isn't the same and therefore by definition you can't compare the others to Scruton's and I'll just put you down as another Whino who blamed the ref when they lost.